2014 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
122 |
64.6% |
No
|
67 |
35.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
189 |
See Details » |
|
2014 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
135 |
71.8% |
No
|
53 |
28.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
188 |
See Details » |
|
2014 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
135 |
71.8% |
No
|
53 |
28.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
188 |
See Details » |
|
2014 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
137 |
73.7% |
No
|
49 |
26.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
186 |
See Details » |
|
2014 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Jefferson are now 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in September 13, 2016?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
76 |
31.0% |
No
|
169 |
69.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
245 |
See Details » |
|
2014 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Monroe are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in September 13, 2016?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
138 |
43.3% |
No
|
181 |
56.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
319 |
See Details » |
|
2012 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Lyman are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in September 9, 2014?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
111 |
40.5% |
No
|
163 |
59.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
274 |
See Details » |
|
2012 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Stratham are now 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in September 9, 2014?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2,068 |
46.3% |
No
|
2,394 |
53.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
4,462 |
See Details » |
|
2012 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the second part of the constitution by inserting after article 5-b a new article to read as follows:
"[Art.] 5-c. [Income Tax Prohibited.] Notwithstanding any general or special provision of this constitution, the general court shall not have the power or authority to ...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
355,054 |
57.1% |
No
|
266,883 |
42.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
621,937 |
See Details » |
|
2012 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending article 73-a of the second part of the constitution to read as follows:
"[Art.] 73-a [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. The chief justice shall, with the concurrence of a majority ...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
294,164 |
48.8% |
No
|
308,094 |
51.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
602,258 |
See Details » |
|
2012 |
3 |
Shall there be a convention to amend or revise the Constitution?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
215,679 |
36.0% |
No
|
384,014 |
64.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
599,693 |
See Details » |
|
2010 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
153 |
42.5% |
No
|
207 |
57.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
360 |
See Details » |
|
2010 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
226 |
62.4% |
No
|
136 |
37.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
362 |
See Details » |
|
2010 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
232 |
63.9% |
No
|
131 |
36.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
363 |
See Details » |
|
2010 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
234 |
64.5% |
No
|
129 |
35.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
363 |
See Details » |
|
2010 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Hampstead are now 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2012?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
79 |
23.1% |
No
|
263 |
76.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
342 |
See Details » |
|
2010 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Lisbon are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2012?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,542 |
47.9% |
No
|
1,678 |
52.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
3,220 |
See Details » |
|
2010 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Peterborough are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2012?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2,065 |
83.4% |
No
|
412 |
16.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,477 |
See Details » |
|
2008 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
111 |
50.9% |
No
|
107 |
49.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
218 |
See Details » |
|
2008 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
125 |
59.8% |
No
|
84 |
40.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
209 |
See Details » |
|
2008 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
137 |
62.6% |
No
|
82 |
37.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
219 |
See Details » |
|
2008 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
131 |
59.8% |
No
|
88 |
40.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
219 |
See Details » |
|
2008 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Fremont are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 8:00 p.m. for all regular elections beginning in 2010?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,864 |
87.1% |
No
|
277 |
12.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,141 |
See Details » |
|
2008 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Harrisville are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2010?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
114 |
18.5% |
No
|
502 |
81.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
616 |
See Details » |
|
2006 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the first part of the constitution by inserting a new article 12-a to provide that private property can only be taken as follows:
"[Art.] 12-a [Power to Take Property Limited.] No part of a person's property shall be taken by eminent domain and transferred, directly or i...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
316,005 |
85.7% |
No
|
52,893 |
14.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
368,898 |
See Details » |
|
2006 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the second part of the Constitution by
amending article 11 to read as follows:
"[Art.] 11. [Small Towns; Representative by Districts.] When the population of any town or ward, according to the last federal census, is within a reasonable deviation from the ideal populatio...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
240,767 |
70.5% |
No
|
100,688 |
29.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
341,455 |
See Details » |
|
2006 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Franconia are now 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular elections beginning in 2008?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
91 |
18.8% |
No
|
394 |
81.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
485 |
See Details » |
|
2004 |
|
Are you in favor of repealing and reenacting part II, article 73-a of the constitution in order to clarify that both the judiciary and legislature have the authority to regulate court practices and procedures and to resolve potential conflicts that may arise so that it reads as follows:
"[Art.] 7...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
271,091 |
56.9% |
No
|
205,589 |
43.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
476,680 |
See Details » |
|
2004 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
130 |
69.5% |
No
|
57 |
30.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
187 |
See Details » |
|
2004 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
165 |
88.2% |
No
|
22 |
11.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
187 |
See Details » |
|
2004 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
162 |
86.6% |
No
|
25 |
13.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
187 |
See Details » |
|
2004 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
147 |
79.0% |
No
|
39 |
21.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
186 |
See Details » |
|
2004 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Stratford are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2006?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
141 |
54.0% |
No
|
120 |
46.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
261 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
1 |
Shall there be a convention to amend or revise the constitution?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
221,588 |
63.1% |
No
|
129,579 |
36.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
351,167 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending article 73-a of the second part of the constitution to read as follows:
[Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. The chief justice shall, with the concurrence of a majority o...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
177,721 |
49.1% |
No
|
184,042 |
50.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
361,763 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Columbia are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
104 |
61.5% |
No
|
65 |
38.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
169 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Dummer are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
71 |
59.7% |
No
|
48 |
40.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
119 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Errol are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
52 |
49.1% |
No
|
54 |
50.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
106 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Jefferson are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
114 |
31.8% |
No
|
244 |
68.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
358 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Monroe are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
124 |
41.2% |
No
|
177 |
58.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
301 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Pittsburg are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
152 |
54.1% |
No
|
129 |
45.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
281 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Springfield are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
127 |
30.0% |
No
|
297 |
70.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
424 |
See Details » |
|
2002 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Sugar Hill are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:30 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
213 |
71.2% |
No
|
86 |
28.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
299 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that municipalities shall have home rule authority to exercise such powers and perform such functions pertaining to its government and affairs which are not prohibited by the state constitution, state statute, or common law, and that the state...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
202,367 |
48.0% |
No
|
218,875 |
52.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
421,242 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Alexandria are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
178 |
31.7% |
No
|
384 |
68.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
562 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Brookfield are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
97 |
30.8% |
No
|
218 |
69.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
315 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Croydon are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
89 |
31.2% |
No
|
196 |
68.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
285 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Dalton are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
117 |
33.9% |
No
|
228 |
66.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
345 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Danbury are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
142 |
30.7% |
No
|
321 |
69.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
463 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Dummer are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
70 |
45.2% |
No
|
85 |
54.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
155 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Franconia are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
160 |
30.0% |
No
|
374 |
70.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
534 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Gilsum are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
92 |
31.4% |
No
|
201 |
68.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
293 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Hill are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
102 |
26.8% |
No
|
278 |
73.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
380 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Hinsdale are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
236 |
21.0% |
No
|
889 |
79.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,125 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Langdon are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
86 |
32.1% |
No
|
182 |
67.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
268 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Lempster are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
123 |
33.2% |
No
|
248 |
66.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
371 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Lincoln are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 6:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
108 |
17.0% |
No
|
529 |
83.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
637 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Lyman are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
91 |
42.1% |
No
|
125 |
57.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
216 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Madbury are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
161 |
20.2% |
No
|
638 |
79.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
799 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Marlborough are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
249 |
27.9% |
No
|
645 |
72.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
894 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Marlow are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
103 |
28.6% |
No
|
257 |
71.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
360 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Milan are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
152 |
27.1% |
No
|
408 |
72.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
560 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Newbury are now 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 8:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
235 |
25.7% |
No
|
679 |
74.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
914 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Orford are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
120 |
26.0% |
No
|
342 |
74.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
462 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Plainfield are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
194 |
18.2% |
No
|
874 |
81.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,068 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Richmond are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
153 |
32.6% |
No
|
317 |
67.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
470 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Salisbury are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
223 |
38.9% |
No
|
350 |
61.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
573 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Sandwich are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
217 |
29.3% |
No
|
523 |
70.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
740 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Stoddard are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
124 |
27.0% |
No
|
336 |
73.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
460 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Stratford are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
90 |
43.1% |
No
|
119 |
56.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
209 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Sugar Hill are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:30 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
125 |
38.5% |
No
|
200 |
61.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
325 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Troy are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
180 |
19.4% |
No
|
749 |
80.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
929 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Wentworth are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
128 |
39.5% |
No
|
196 |
60.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
324 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Westmoreland are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
234 |
30.6% |
No
|
531 |
69.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
765 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Whitefield are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
165 |
20.2% |
No
|
650 |
79.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
815 |
See Details » |
|
2000 |
|
Polling hours in the town of Woodstock are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
153 |
29.7% |
No
|
363 |
70.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
516 |
See Details » |
|
1998 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the minimum age requirement for state senator shall be changed from 30 to 25 years of age? (Passed by the N.H. House 323 Yes 29 No; Passed by State Senate 15 Yes 6 No) CACR22See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
119,104 |
41.3% |
No
|
169,439 |
58.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
288,543 |
See Details » |
|
1998 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to make it more inclusive by changing specific references to the governor and other people to gender neutral terms? (Passed by the N.H. House 303 Yes 26 No; Passed by State Senate 24 Yes 0 No) CACR18See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
159,308 |
56.7% |
No
|
121,441 |
43.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
280,749 |
See Details » |
|
1998 |
|
Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
144 |
40.3% |
No
|
213 |
59.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
357 |
See Details » |
|
1998 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
115 |
32.1% |
No
|
243 |
67.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
358 |
See Details » |
|
1998 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
135 |
37.6% |
No
|
224 |
62.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
359 |
See Details » |
|
1998 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
133 |
36.7% |
No
|
229 |
63.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
362 |
See Details » |
|
1998 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
88 |
24.6% |
No
|
270 |
75.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
358 |
See Details » |
|
1996 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
125 |
53.0% |
No
|
111 |
47.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
236 |
See Details » |
|
1996 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
181 |
74.5% |
No
|
62 |
25.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
243 |
See Details » |
|
1996 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
178 |
73.6% |
No
|
64 |
26.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
242 |
See Details » |
|
1996 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
131 |
55.5% |
No
|
105 |
44.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
236 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
97 |
28.4% |
No
|
245 |
71.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
342 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
105 |
30.8% |
No
|
236 |
69.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
341 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
109 |
31.6% |
No
|
236 |
68.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
345 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
75 |
21.9% |
No
|
267 |
78.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
342 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
197 |
68.2% |
No
|
92 |
31.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
289 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
128 |
37.3% |
No
|
215 |
62.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
343 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Barnstead at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
657 |
86.1% |
No
|
106 |
13.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
763 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Belmont at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,063 |
0.0% |
No
|
232 |
100.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,295 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Center Harbor at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
225 |
73.1% |
No
|
83 |
26.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
308 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Gilmanton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
562 |
76.7% |
No
|
171 |
23.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
733 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in New Hampton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
351 |
73.0% |
No
|
130 |
27.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
481 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Sanbornton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
594 |
82.6% |
No
|
125 |
17.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
719 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Tilton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
595 |
81.8% |
No
|
132 |
18.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
727 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Albany at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
82 |
59.4% |
No
|
56 |
40.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
138 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Bartlett at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
698 |
90.1% |
No
|
77 |
9.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
775 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Brookfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
133 |
64.9% |
No
|
72 |
35.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
205 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Chatham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
25 |
36.2% |
No
|
44 |
63.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
69 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Eaton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
58 |
46.8% |
No
|
66 |
53.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
124 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Effingham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
126 |
100.0% |
No
|
111 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
237 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Freedom at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
345 |
83.7% |
No
|
67 |
16.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
412 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hart's Location at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
6 |
31.6% |
No
|
13 |
68.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
19 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Jackson at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
221 |
70.2% |
No
|
94 |
29.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
315 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Madison at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
400 |
81.6% |
No
|
90 |
18.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
490 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Moultonborough at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,019 |
87.4% |
No
|
147 |
12.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,166 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Ossipee at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
666 |
82.8% |
No
|
138 |
17.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
804 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Sandwich at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
388 |
75.8% |
No
|
124 |
24.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
512 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Tamworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
472 |
81.4% |
No
|
108 |
18.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
580 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Tuftonboro at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
514 |
77.9% |
No
|
146 |
22.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
660 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Wakefield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
878 |
85.1% |
No
|
154 |
14.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,032 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Wolfeboro at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,396 |
0.0% |
No
|
196 |
100.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,592 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Alstead at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
353 |
63.1% |
No
|
206 |
36.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
559 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Chesterfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
680 |
82.6% |
No
|
143 |
17.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
823 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Dublin at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
411 |
77.3% |
No
|
121 |
22.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
532 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Fitzwilliam at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
344 |
71.5% |
No
|
137 |
28.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
481 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Gilsum at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
84 |
53.2% |
No
|
74 |
46.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
158 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Harrisville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
224 |
67.3% |
No
|
109 |
32.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
333 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hinsdale at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
518 |
81.1% |
No
|
121 |
18.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
639 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Jaffrey at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,035 |
85.5% |
No
|
175 |
14.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,210 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Keene at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
4,426 |
88.0% |
No
|
602 |
12.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
5,028 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Marlborough at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
367 |
71.4% |
No
|
147 |
28.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
514 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Marlow at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
126 |
53.4% |
No
|
110 |
46.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
236 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Nelson at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
108 |
58.4% |
No
|
77 |
41.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
185 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Richmond at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
136 |
50.9% |
No
|
131 |
49.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
267 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Roxbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
12 |
16.2% |
No
|
62 |
83.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
74 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Stoddard at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
123 |
60.6% |
No
|
80 |
39.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
203 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Sullivan at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
82 |
52.9% |
No
|
73 |
47.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
155 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Surry at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
81 |
40.5% |
No
|
119 |
59.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
200 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Swanzey at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,276 |
90.2% |
No
|
138 |
9.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,414 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Troy at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
336 |
75.7% |
No
|
108 |
24.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
444 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Walpole at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
843 |
80.1% |
No
|
209 |
19.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,052 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Westmoreland at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
360 |
70.7% |
No
|
149 |
29.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
509 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Winchester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
619 |
84.7% |
No
|
112 |
15.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
731 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Berlin at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2,129 |
76.6% |
No
|
649 |
23.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,778 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Carroll at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
137 |
66.8% |
No
|
68 |
33.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
205 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Clarksville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
24 |
40.7% |
No
|
35 |
59.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
59 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Colebrook at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
379 |
75.2% |
No
|
125 |
24.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
504 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Columbia at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
77 |
67.5% |
No
|
37 |
32.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
114 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Dalton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
143 |
65.0% |
No
|
77 |
35.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
220 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Dixville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1 |
6.7% |
No
|
14 |
93.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
15 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Dummer at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
52 |
55.9% |
No
|
41 |
44.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
93 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Errol at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
54 |
69.2% |
No
|
24 |
30.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
78 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Gorham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
665 |
81.9% |
No
|
147 |
18.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
812 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Jefferson at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
198 |
67.6% |
No
|
95 |
32.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
293 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Lancaster at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
758 |
87.6% |
No
|
107 |
12.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
865 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Milan at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
207 |
74.2% |
No
|
72 |
25.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
279 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Millsfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1 |
20.0% |
No
|
4 |
80.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
5 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Northumberland at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
378 |
74.1% |
No
|
132 |
25.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
510 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Pittsburg at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
137 |
66.2% |
No
|
70 |
33.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
207 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Randolph at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
66 |
33.2% |
No
|
133 |
66.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
199 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Shelburne at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
61 |
44.5% |
No
|
76 |
55.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
137 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Stark at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
58 |
56.3% |
No
|
45 |
43.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
103 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Stewartstown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
89 |
60.5% |
No
|
58 |
39.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
147 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Stratford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
92 |
69.7% |
No
|
40 |
30.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
132 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Whitefield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
423 |
85.1% |
No
|
74 |
14.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
497 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Alexandria at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
207 |
63.9% |
No
|
117 |
36.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
324 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Ashland at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
347 |
79.6% |
No
|
89 |
20.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
436 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Bath at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
148 |
67.9% |
No
|
70 |
32.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
218 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Benton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
35 |
47.9% |
No
|
38 |
52.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
73 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Bethlehem at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
437 |
84.7% |
No
|
79 |
15.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
516 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Bridgewater at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
140 |
40.9% |
No
|
202 |
59.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
342 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Bristol at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
613 |
78.8% |
No
|
165 |
21.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
778 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Campton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
491 |
74.2% |
No
|
171 |
25.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
662 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Canaan at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
627 |
83.2% |
No
|
127 |
16.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
754 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Dorchester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
62 |
57.9% |
No
|
45 |
42.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
107 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Easton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
33 |
34.7% |
No
|
62 |
65.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
95 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Ellsworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
12 |
38.7% |
No
|
19 |
61.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
31 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Enfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
798 |
88.2% |
No
|
107 |
11.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
905 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Franconia at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
235 |
69.3% |
No
|
104 |
30.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
339 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Grafton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
172 |
71.1% |
No
|
70 |
28.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
242 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Groton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
63 |
62.4% |
No
|
38 |
37.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
101 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hebron at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
89 |
42.6% |
No
|
120 |
57.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
209 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Holderness at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
467 |
82.2% |
No
|
101 |
17.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
568 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Landaff at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
35 |
38.5% |
No
|
56 |
61.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
91 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Lincoln at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
247 |
75.8% |
No
|
79 |
24.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
326 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Lisbon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
224 |
73.7% |
No
|
80 |
26.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
304 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Lyman at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
70 |
56.9% |
No
|
53 |
43.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
123 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Monroe at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
228 |
68.7% |
No
|
104 |
31.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
332 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Orange at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
34 |
38.2% |
No
|
55 |
61.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
89 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Orford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
195 |
70.4% |
No
|
82 |
29.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
277 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Piermont at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
123 |
61.8% |
No
|
76 |
38.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
199 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Plymouth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
858 |
77.2% |
No
|
254 |
22.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,112 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Rumney at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
321 |
67.4% |
No
|
155 |
32.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
476 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Sugar Hill at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
153 |
61.2% |
No
|
97 |
38.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
250 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Thornton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
379 |
78.1% |
No
|
106 |
21.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
485 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Warren at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
123 |
69.1% |
No
|
55 |
30.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
178 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Waterville Valley at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
30 |
30.6% |
No
|
68 |
69.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
98 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Wentworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
109 |
56.2% |
No
|
85 |
43.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
194 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Woodstock at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
216 |
76.6% |
No
|
66 |
23.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
282 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Antrim at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
543 |
80.3% |
No
|
133 |
19.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
676 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Bennington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
299 |
90.3% |
No
|
32 |
9.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
331 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Brookline at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
750 |
85.1% |
No
|
131 |
14.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
881 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Deering at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
303 |
76.1% |
No
|
95 |
23.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
398 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Francestown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
409 |
81.0% |
No
|
96 |
19.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
505 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Greenfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
289 |
82.6% |
No
|
61 |
17.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
350 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Greenville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
334 |
84.1% |
No
|
63 |
15.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
397 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hancock at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
620 |
91.9% |
No
|
55 |
8.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
675 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hillsborough at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
898 |
86.1% |
No
|
145 |
13.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,043 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Lyndeborough at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
272 |
73.1% |
No
|
100 |
26.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
372 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Mason at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
206 |
65.4% |
No
|
109 |
34.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
315 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Mont Vernon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
480 |
84.4% |
No
|
89 |
15.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
569 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in New Ipswich at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
776 |
81.3% |
No
|
179 |
18.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
955 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Pelham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,750 |
84.1% |
No
|
332 |
15.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,082 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Sharon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
50 |
44.2% |
No
|
63 |
55.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
113 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Temple at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
243 |
68.8% |
No
|
110 |
31.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
353 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Wilton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
812 |
83.7% |
No
|
158 |
16.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
970 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Windsor at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
13 |
33.3% |
No
|
26 |
66.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
39 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Allenstown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
802 |
81.8% |
No
|
178 |
18.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
980 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Andover at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
398 |
75.7% |
No
|
128 |
24.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
526 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Boscawen at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
615 |
84.2% |
No
|
115 |
15.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
730 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Bow at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,903 |
82.1% |
No
|
416 |
17.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,319 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Bradford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
396 |
75.9% |
No
|
126 |
24.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
522 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Chichester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
508 |
87.4% |
No
|
73 |
12.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
581 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Danbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
153 |
59.5% |
No
|
104 |
40.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
257 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Dunbarton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
455 |
77.0% |
No
|
136 |
23.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
591 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Epsom at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
755 |
85.3% |
No
|
130 |
14.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
885 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Franklin at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,306 |
81.8% |
No
|
290 |
18.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,596 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Henniker at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
940 |
84.2% |
No
|
177 |
15.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,117 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hill at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
136 |
64.5% |
No
|
75 |
35.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
211 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hooksett at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,540 |
69.9% |
No
|
662 |
30.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,202 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Loudon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
803 |
88.2% |
No
|
107 |
11.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
910 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Newbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
403 |
76.6% |
No
|
123 |
23.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
526 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in New London at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,271 |
84.5% |
No
|
233 |
15.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,504 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Northfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
651 |
83.5% |
No
|
129 |
16.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
780 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Pittsfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
572 |
85.9% |
No
|
94 |
14.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
666 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Salisbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
240 |
68.2% |
No
|
112 |
31.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
352 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Sutton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
382 |
77.6% |
No
|
110 |
22.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
492 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Warner at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
672 |
86.2% |
No
|
108 |
13.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
780 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Webster at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
276 |
60.4% |
No
|
181 |
39.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
457 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Wilmot at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
226 |
64.6% |
No
|
124 |
35.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
350 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Atkinson at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,318 |
85.6% |
No
|
222 |
14.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,540 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Brentwood at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
517 |
81.3% |
No
|
119 |
18.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
636 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Candia at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
758 |
81.6% |
No
|
171 |
18.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
929 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Chester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
677 |
85.1% |
No
|
119 |
14.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
796 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Danville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
479 |
81.5% |
No
|
109 |
18.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
588 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in East Kingston at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
297 |
72.8% |
No
|
111 |
27.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
408 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Epping at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,001 |
84.0% |
No
|
190 |
16.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,191 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Fremont at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
509 |
83.7% |
No
|
99 |
16.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
608 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Greenland at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
679 |
86.5% |
No
|
106 |
13.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
785 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hampstead at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,374 |
84.9% |
No
|
244 |
15.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,618 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Hampton Falls at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
592 |
84.7% |
No
|
107 |
15.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
699 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Kensington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
398 |
79.1% |
No
|
105 |
20.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
503 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Kingston at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,004 |
81.3% |
No
|
231 |
18.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,235 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in New Castle at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
206 |
48.1% |
No
|
222 |
51.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
428 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Newfields at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
250 |
75.3% |
No
|
82 |
24.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
332 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Newington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
134 |
62.0% |
No
|
82 |
38.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
216 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Newton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
553 |
80.5% |
No
|
134 |
19.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
687 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Northwood at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
573 |
83.9% |
No
|
110 |
16.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
683 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Nottingham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
656 |
90.1% |
No
|
72 |
9.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
728 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Raymond at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,396 |
84.5% |
No
|
256 |
15.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,652 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Rye at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,506 |
89.0% |
No
|
186 |
11.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,692 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Sandown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
796 |
83.4% |
No
|
159 |
16.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
955 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in South Hampton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
137 |
47.2% |
No
|
153 |
52.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
290 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Windham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2,110 |
89.0% |
No
|
262 |
11.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,372 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Barrington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,200 |
84.9% |
No
|
213 |
15.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,413 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Farmington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
710 |
87.5% |
No
|
101 |
12.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
811 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Madbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
343 |
75.4% |
No
|
112 |
24.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
455 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Middleton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
120 |
64.5% |
No
|
66 |
35.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
186 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Milton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
560 |
82.7% |
No
|
117 |
17.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
677 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in New Durham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
384 |
81.2% |
No
|
89 |
18.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
473 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Rochester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
5,479 |
87.9% |
No
|
757 |
12.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
6,236 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Rollinsford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
541 |
78.4% |
No
|
149 |
21.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
690 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Somersworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,810 |
83.4% |
No
|
359 |
16.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,169 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Strafford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
598 |
82.7% |
No
|
125 |
17.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
723 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Acworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
141 |
58.3% |
No
|
101 |
41.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
242 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Charlestown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
649 |
83.6% |
No
|
127 |
16.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
776 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Claremont at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2,853 |
88.4% |
No
|
376 |
11.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
3,229 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Cornish at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
450 |
77.5% |
No
|
131 |
22.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
581 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Croydon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
128 |
67.4% |
No
|
62 |
32.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
190 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Goshen at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
167 |
65.2% |
No
|
89 |
34.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
256 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Grantham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
544 |
82.2% |
No
|
118 |
17.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
662 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Langdon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
96 |
58.9% |
No
|
67 |
41.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
163 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Lempster at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
154 |
50.3% |
No
|
152 |
49.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
306 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Newport at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,034 |
83.9% |
No
|
199 |
16.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,233 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Plainfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
542 |
79.4% |
No
|
141 |
20.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
683 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Springfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
211 |
70.1% |
No
|
90 |
29.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
301 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Sunapee at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
920 |
85.1% |
No
|
161 |
14.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,081 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Unity at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
254 |
73.6% |
No
|
91 |
26.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
345 |
See Details » |
|
1994 |
|
Shall we adopt polling hours in Washington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
155 |
66.8% |
No
|
77 |
33.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
232 |
See Details » |
|
1992 |
1 |
Shall there be a convention to amend or revise the constitution?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
210,346 |
49.0% |
No
|
217,575 |
51.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
427,921 |
See Details » |
|
1992 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that 12-person juries shall be required in capital cases and in cases in which imprisonment may exceed one year; but that, in civil cases and in cases in which imprisonment may be one year or less, a 6-person jury shall be required? (Passed by...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
278,998 |
61.0% |
No
|
178,817 |
39.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
457,815 |
See Details » |
|
1992 |
3 |
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the legislature may delegate regulatory authority to executive branch officials, but that any proposed rules may be disapproved by the legislature or an appropriate legislative committee, as prescribed by law? (Passed by N.H. House 331 Ye...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
208,301 |
47.8% |
No
|
225,276 |
52.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
433,577 |
See Details » |
|
1992 |
4 |
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to allow members of a military reserve or national guard unit occasionally called upon to serve in an emergency to hold the state office of governor, senator, representative, or executive councilor? (Passed by N.H. House 319 Yes 10 No, passed State Senat...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
249,759 |
54.9% |
No
|
204,475 |
45.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
454,234 |
See Details » |
|
1992 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
142 |
33.5% |
No
|
282 |
66.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
424 |
See Details » |
|
1992 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
140 |
34.1% |
No
|
270 |
65.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
410 |
See Details » |
|
1992 |
|
Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
185 |
43.5% |
No
|
240 |
56.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
425 |
See Details » |
|
1990 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the constitution by providing that all moneys received from any state-run lottery and all interest received on such moneys, after deducting the necessary cost of administration, shall be used exclusively for the purpose of state aid to education? (Passed by N.H. House, 3...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
199,229 |
88.4% |
No
|
26,336 |
11.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
225,565 |
See Details » |
|
1990 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
118 |
30.9% |
No
|
264 |
69.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
382 |
See Details » |
|
1990 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
118 |
31.1% |
No
|
261 |
68.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
379 |
See Details » |
|
1990 |
|
Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
127 |
33.2% |
No
|
256 |
66.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
383 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that, in order to entitle the parties to a trial by jury in civil cases, the amount involved in such cases must exceed $1,500 instead of $500 as is now provided? (Passed by N.H, House, 302 Yes 23 No, passed State Senate 18 Yes 3 No) (CACR 4)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
250,413 |
70.0% |
No
|
108,267 |
30.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
358,680 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the legislature may delegate regulatory authority to executive branch officials, but that any proposed rules may be disapproved by the legislature or an appropriate legislative committee, as prescribed by law? (Passed by N.H. House, 342 Y...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
184,434 |
55.3% |
No
|
149,303 |
44.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
333,737 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Monroe?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
170 |
45.3% |
No
|
205 |
54.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
375 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Monroe?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
242 |
62.1% |
No
|
148 |
37.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
390 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Monroe?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
240 |
62.2% |
No
|
146 |
37.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
386 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Monroe?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
161 |
43.2% |
No
|
212 |
56.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
373 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Temple?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
160 |
44.2% |
No
|
202 |
55.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
362 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Temple?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
265 |
73.2% |
No
|
97 |
26.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
362 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Temple?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
258 |
72.1% |
No
|
100 |
27.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
358 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Temple?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
204 |
56.7% |
No
|
156 |
43.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
360 |
See Details » |
|
1988 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Sandwich?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
377 |
59.5% |
No
|
257 |
40.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
634 |
See Details » |
|
1986 |
|
Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the amount in controversy required in order for a party to certain civil suits to be entitled to a jury trial shall be determined by law? (Passed by the N.H. House, 316 Yes 13 No, passed State
Senate 23 Yes 0 No)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
107,481 |
64.5% |
No
|
59,835 |
35.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
167,316 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that voting registration and polling places shall be easily accessible to all qualified persons including disabled and elderly persons? (Passed by a vote of 266 Yes, 44 No)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
306,771 |
85.3% |
No
|
52,826 |
14.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
359,597 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to prohibit the state from mandating or assigning any new, expanded, or modified programs or responsibilities which require additional local expenditures to any political subdivision, unless such programs or responsibilities are either fully funded by th...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
237,210 |
70.3% |
No
|
99,609 |
29.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
336,819 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
3 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that no footnote or section of any budget bill before the legislature shall contain any provision which establishes, amends or repeals statutory law, other than provisions establishing, amending or repealing operating and capital expenses for ...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
262,572 |
80.7% |
No
|
62,047 |
19.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
324,619 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
4 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to change the size of New Hampshire's legislative bodies without changing the total number of legislators by decreasing the current size of the House of Representatives by 12, to 388 members, and increasing the current size of the Senate by 12, to 36 mem...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
204,123 |
61.8% |
No
|
127,682 |
38.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
331,805 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
5 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for annual sessions of the legislature; and to restrict mileage payments for actual attendance on legislative days to a maximum of 45 legislative days per session but not after the first day of July of each year? (Passed by a vote of 278 Yes, ...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
247,257 |
65.5% |
No
|
85,314 |
34.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
332,571 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
6 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to reduce the age requirement for persons being elected to the office of state senator or executive councilor from 30 years of age to 25 years of age? (Passed by a vote of 279 Yes, 66 No)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
169,158 |
42.1% |
No
|
180,017 |
57.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
349,175 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
7 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that, in order to commit a person in a criminal insanity proceeding, the state must establish that the person is potentially dangerous to himself or to others and suffers from a mental disorder by a standard of "clear and convincing evidence" ...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
258,452 |
75.7% |
No
|
82,736 |
24.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
341,188 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
8 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that, in order to entitle the parties to a trial by jury in civil cases, the amount involved in such cases must exceed $5,000 instead of $500 as is now provided? (Passed by a vote of 288 Yes, 60 No)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
217,717 |
64.3% |
No
|
121,222 |
35.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
338,939 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
9 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to eliminate the power of the governor and council to prorogue (that is, to extend) a recess of the legislature, without its consent, for up to 90 days? (Passed by a vote of 251 Yes, 89 No)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
204,745 |
62.6% |
No
|
122,909 |
37.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
327,654 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
10 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that all the assets of both the New Hampshire retirement system and any other retirement system for public officers and employees operated by the state or its political subdivisions shall be used exclusively for the benefit of any such retirem...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
288,994 |
85.5% |
No
|
48,690 |
14.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
337,684 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
A |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to change the date on which the votes for councilors are laid before the house of representatives and senate to the first Wednesday following the first Tuesday in January? (Passed by the N.H. House, 300 Yes 0 No, passed State Senate 21 Yes 0 No)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
215,083 |
76.6% |
No
|
65,480 |
23.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
280,563 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
B |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that in the event of a vacancy in the office of governor or the incapacity of the governor to perform his duties, the president of the senate, speaker of the house, secretary of state and state treasurer, in that order, shall be acting governo...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
247,393 |
88.2% |
No
|
44,763 |
11.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
292,156 |
See Details » |
|
1984 |
C |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for electing the governor every four years, with a limitation of 2 consecutive terms?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
193,506 |
55.9% |
No
|
110,700 |
44.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
304,206 |
See Details » |
|
1982 |
1 |
Shall there be a convention to amend the constitution?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
115,351 |
56.5% |
No
|
105,207 |
43.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
220,558 |
See Details » |
|
1982 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that the Secretary of State shall lay the votes for Governor before the senate and house of representatives on the first Wednesday following the first Tuesday of January? (Passed by the N.H. House 283 Yes 1 No, passed State Senate, 20 Yes 0 No...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
148,705 |
95.0% |
No
|
61,925 |
5.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
210,630 |
See Details » |
|
1982 |
3 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution of New Hampshire to affirm that all persons have the right to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property, and the state? (Passed by the N.H. House, 269 Yes 85 No, passed State Senate, 19 Yes 2 No))See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
178,791 |
76.5% |
No
|
66,441 |
23.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
245,232 |
See Details » |
|
1982 |
4 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for electing the Governor every four years, with a limitation of two consecutive terms? (Passed by the N.H. House, 329 Yes 12 No, passed State Senate, 20 Yes 3 No)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
151,379 |
65.4% |
No
|
93,081 |
34.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
244,460 |
See Details » |
|
1982 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
65 |
60.7% |
No
|
42 |
39.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
107 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution so that references in the bill of rights to "men", "man" and "man's" are changed to "people", person and "person's", respectively?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
201,251 |
74.6% |
No
|
123,901 |
25.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
325,152 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution by removing certain obsolete provisions and rewriting them as follows:
(a) In Article 27, Part First, to allow "civil authorities" rather than "civil magistrates" to quarter troops in homes in times of war, subject to the control of the legislature?
(b) ...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
205,432 |
75.5% |
No
|
98,732 |
24.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
304,164 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
3 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to repeal Article 99 of Part Second which contains procedures for amending the Constitution now covered by Article 100 and to incorporate in Article 100 the existing provision in Article 99 for approval of constitutional amendments by two-thirds of the q...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
189,321 |
83.1% |
No
|
80,588 |
16.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
269,909 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
4 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to require all proposed constitutional amendments to be submitted to the voters at the next biennial November election following their proposal?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
261,660 |
95.0% |
No
|
40,899 |
5.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
302,559 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
5 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to require a three-fifths vote by the entire membership of the constitutional convention to propose constitutional amendments? (Passed by the N.H. House, 319 Yes 20 No, passed State Senate, 23 Yes 0 No.)See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
249,284 |
90.2% |
No
|
51,524 |
9.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
300,808 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
134 |
54.3% |
No
|
113 |
45.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
247 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
3,911 |
78.6% |
No
|
1,066 |
21.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
4,977 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
4,044 |
80.1% |
No
|
1,003 |
19.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
5,047 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
211 |
80.5% |
No
|
51 |
19.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
262 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
475 |
91.7% |
No
|
43 |
8.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
518 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
409 |
79.0% |
No
|
109 |
21.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
518 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
4,103 |
81.4% |
No
|
939 |
18.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
5,042 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
138 |
72.6% |
No
|
52 |
27.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
190 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
735 |
64.6% |
No
|
402 |
35.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,137 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
224 |
58.0% |
No
|
162 |
42.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
386 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
530 |
72.5% |
No
|
201 |
27.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
731 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
179 |
73.7% |
No
|
64 |
26.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
243 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,463 |
69.8% |
No
|
634 |
30.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,097 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
172 |
47.1% |
No
|
193 |
52.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
365 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,639 |
78.4% |
No
|
451 |
21.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,090 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
122 |
59.8% |
No
|
82 |
40.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
204 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
183 |
47.4% |
No
|
203 |
52.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
386 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
370 |
70.1% |
No
|
158 |
29.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
528 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
70 |
71.4% |
No
|
28 |
28.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
98 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
412 |
68.8% |
No
|
187 |
31.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
599 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
128 |
64.3% |
No
|
71 |
35.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
199 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
33 |
62.3% |
No
|
20 |
37.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
53 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
62 |
60.2% |
No
|
41 |
39.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
103 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
199 |
73.7% |
No
|
71 |
26.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
270 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Missing Data
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
8 |
0.0% |
No
|
1 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
9 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
173 |
70.9% |
No
|
71 |
29.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
244 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
315 |
70.6% |
No
|
131 |
29.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
446 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
713 |
72.0% |
No
|
277 |
28.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
990 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
410 |
71.8% |
No
|
161 |
28.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
571 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
497 |
68.5% |
No
|
229 |
31.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
726 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,072 |
76.3% |
No
|
333 |
23.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,405 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
128 |
59.3% |
No
|
88 |
40.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
216 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
196 |
51.4% |
No
|
185 |
48.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
381 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
209 |
63.9% |
No
|
118 |
36.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
327 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
71 |
61.7% |
No
|
44 |
38.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
115 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
118 |
54.6% |
No
|
98 |
45.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
216 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
339 |
73.4% |
No
|
123 |
26.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
462 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
715 |
72.3% |
No
|
274 |
27.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
989 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
264 |
67.3% |
No
|
128 |
32.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
392 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
82 |
44.8% |
No
|
101 |
55.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
183 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
67 |
60.9% |
No
|
43 |
39.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
110 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
336 |
60.9% |
No
|
216 |
39.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
552 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
85 |
62.5% |
No
|
51 |
37.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
136 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
42 |
43.8% |
No
|
54 |
56.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
96 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
74 |
76.3% |
No
|
23 |
23.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
97 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
569 |
65.7% |
No
|
297 |
34.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
866 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
199 |
67.9% |
No
|
94 |
32.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
293 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
456 |
65.8% |
No
|
237 |
34.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
693 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
233 |
67.1% |
No
|
114 |
32.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
347 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,623 |
80.4% |
No
|
395 |
19.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,018 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
104 |
74.3% |
No
|
36 |
25.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
140 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
24 |
50.0% |
No
|
24 |
50.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
48 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
265 |
64.0% |
No
|
149 |
36.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
414 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
54 |
67.5% |
No
|
26 |
32.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
80 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
3 |
15.8% |
No
|
16 |
84.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
19 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
29 |
52.7% |
No
|
26 |
47.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
55 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
41 |
64.1% |
No
|
23 |
35.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
64 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
186 |
56.4% |
No
|
144 |
43.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
330 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
405 |
69.7% |
No
|
176 |
30.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
581 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
143 |
68.8% |
No
|
65 |
31.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
208 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2 |
28.6% |
No
|
5 |
71.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
7 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
376 |
78.5% |
No
|
103 |
21.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
479 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
98 |
60.1% |
No
|
65 |
39.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
163 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
89 |
61.0% |
No
|
57 |
39.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
146 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
67 |
55.4% |
No
|
54 |
44.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
121 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
65 |
62.5% |
No
|
39 |
37.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
104 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
188 |
73.2% |
No
|
69 |
26.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
257 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
84 |
56.8% |
No
|
64 |
43.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
148 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
38 |
66.7% |
No
|
19 |
33.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
57 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
205 |
68.8% |
No
|
93 |
31.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
298 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
380 |
76.9% |
No
|
114 |
23.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
494 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
168 |
61.3% |
No
|
106 |
38.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
274 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
291 |
69.6% |
No
|
127 |
30.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
418 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
36 |
66.7% |
No
|
18 |
33.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
54 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
8 |
32.0% |
No
|
17 |
68.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
25 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
130 |
67.0% |
No
|
64 |
33.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
194 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
39 |
73.6% |
No
|
14 |
26.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
53 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,031 |
60.8% |
No
|
664 |
39.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,695 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
420 |
73.6% |
No
|
151 |
26.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
571 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
67 |
76.5% |
No
|
20 |
23.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
87 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
23 |
78.5% |
No
|
22 |
21.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
45 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,350 |
96.7% |
No
|
392 |
3.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,742 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
168 |
100.0% |
No
|
47 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
215 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
188 |
33.8% |
No
|
73 |
66.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
261 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
67 |
56.4% |
No
|
25 |
43.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
92 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
160 |
96.1% |
No
|
102 |
3.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
262 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
126 |
1.0% |
No
|
60 |
99.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
186 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
22 |
51.1% |
No
|
43 |
48.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
65 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
102 |
0.0% |
No
|
79 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
181 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
138 |
0.0% |
No
|
114 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
252 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
436 |
0.0% |
No
|
174 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
610 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
174 |
0.0% |
No
|
67 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
241 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
77 |
0.0% |
No
|
79 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
156 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
109 |
0.0% |
No
|
39 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
148 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
33 |
0.0% |
No
|
32 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
65 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
72 |
0.0% |
No
|
26 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
98 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
247 |
68.8% |
No
|
112 |
31.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
359 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,217 |
58.2% |
No
|
873 |
41.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,090 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
273 |
55.6% |
No
|
218 |
44.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
491 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,642 |
68.9% |
No
|
742 |
31.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,384 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
133 |
51.8% |
No
|
124 |
48.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
257 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
514 |
71.3% |
No
|
207 |
28.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
721 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
142 |
42.6% |
No
|
191 |
57.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
333 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
15,742 |
74.4% |
No
|
5,213 |
25.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
20,955 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
62 |
0.0% |
No
|
94 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
156 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2,130 |
0.0% |
No
|
690 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,820 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,305 |
0.0% |
No
|
525 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,830 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
292 |
0.0% |
No
|
265 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
557 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
13,639 |
0.0% |
No
|
3,959 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
17,598 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
180 |
44.0% |
No
|
229 |
56.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
409 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
227 |
42.0% |
No
|
313 |
58.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
540 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
630 |
63.8% |
No
|
357 |
36.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
987 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
17 |
23.9% |
No
|
54 |
76.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
71 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
70 |
44.3% |
No
|
88 |
55.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
158 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
361 |
61.5% |
No
|
226 |
38.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
587 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
308 |
57.1% |
No
|
231 |
42.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
539 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
14 |
36.8% |
No
|
24 |
63.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
38 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
504 |
0.0% |
No
|
141 |
0.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
645 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
546 |
78.1% |
No
|
268 |
21.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
814 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
228 |
44.0% |
No
|
290 |
56.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
518 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
162 |
57.9% |
No
|
118 |
42.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
280 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
8,591 |
77.3% |
No
|
2,518 |
22.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
11,109 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
97 |
64.7% |
No
|
53 |
35.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
150 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
180 |
61.4% |
No
|
113 |
38.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
293 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
772 |
75.2% |
No
|
255 |
24.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,027 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
408 |
63.0% |
No
|
240 |
37.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
648 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
651 |
56.2% |
No
|
508 |
43.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,159 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
235 |
55.7% |
No
|
187 |
44.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
422 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
456 |
58.5% |
No
|
323 |
41.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
779 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
240 |
61.7% |
No
|
149 |
38.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
389 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
307 |
72.6% |
No
|
116 |
27.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
423 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
141 |
51.1% |
No
|
135 |
48.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
276 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
379 |
65.1% |
No
|
203 |
34.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
582 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
186 |
53.3% |
No
|
163 |
46.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
349 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
123 |
68.0% |
No
|
58 |
32.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
181 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
707 |
73.6% |
No
|
254 |
26.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
961 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
400 |
68.0% |
No
|
188 |
32.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
588 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
199 |
45.0% |
No
|
243 |
55.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
442 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
315 |
52.7% |
No
|
283 |
47.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
598 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
222 |
52.1% |
No
|
204 |
47.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
426 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
174 |
61.9% |
No
|
107 |
38.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
281 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
253 |
51.4% |
No
|
239 |
48.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
492 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2,164 |
75.4% |
No
|
706 |
24.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,870 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
136 |
56.9% |
No
|
103 |
43.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
239 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
413 |
69.6% |
No
|
180 |
30.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
593 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
168 |
66.4% |
No
|
85 |
33.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
253 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
357 |
70.3% |
No
|
151 |
29.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
508 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
4,039 |
80.7% |
No
|
968 |
19.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
5,007 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
348 |
61.3% |
No
|
220 |
38.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
568 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
166 |
55.9% |
No
|
131 |
44.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
297 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
487 |
67.5% |
No
|
234 |
32.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
721 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
2,020 |
74.4% |
No
|
695 |
25.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,715 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
195 |
70.1% |
No
|
83 |
29.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
278 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
108 |
59.7% |
No
|
73 |
40.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
181 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
466 |
70.9% |
No
|
191 |
29.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
657 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
269 |
61.8% |
No
|
166 |
38.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
435 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
4,191 |
76.4% |
No
|
1,292 |
23.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
5,483 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
617 |
71.5% |
No
|
246 |
28.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
863 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
646 |
64.1% |
No
|
362 |
35.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,008 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
6,013 |
75.1% |
No
|
1,990 |
24.9% |
Total Votes Cast |
8,003 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
322 |
71.2% |
No
|
130 |
28.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
452 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
74 |
49.0% |
No
|
77 |
51.0% |
Total Votes Cast |
151 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
858 |
72.2% |
No
|
331 |
27.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,189 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
5,527 |
78.5% |
No
|
1,510 |
21.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
7,037 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,092 |
67.7% |
No
|
522 |
32.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,614 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
298 |
55.3% |
No
|
241 |
44.7% |
Total Votes Cast |
539 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
204 |
63.2% |
No
|
119 |
36.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
323 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,997 |
80.4% |
No
|
487 |
19.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
2,484 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
246 |
56.9% |
No
|
186 |
43.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
432 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
59 |
44.7% |
No
|
73 |
55.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
132 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
688 |
77.4% |
No
|
201 |
22.6% |
Total Votes Cast |
889 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
1,571 |
79.8% |
No
|
397 |
20.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
1,968 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
181 |
56.2% |
No
|
141 |
43.8% |
Total Votes Cast |
322 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
65 |
57.5% |
No
|
48 |
42.5% |
Total Votes Cast |
113 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
135 |
70.7% |
No
|
56 |
29.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
191 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
56 |
57.7% |
No
|
41 |
42.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
97 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
602 |
72.8% |
No
|
225 |
27.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
827 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
260 |
57.9% |
No
|
189 |
42.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
449 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
81 |
62.8% |
No
|
48 |
37.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
129 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
335 |
63.7% |
No
|
191 |
36.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
526 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
80 |
55.9% |
No
|
63 |
44.1% |
Total Votes Cast |
143 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
|
Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » |
Local Question |
Various cities/towns |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
97 |
49.7% |
No
|
98 |
50.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
195 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to reduce the age requirements so that any qualified voter who meets residency requirements shall be eligible to be governor, governor's councilor or state senator?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
87,065 |
37.6% |
No
|
138,993 |
62.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
226,058 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that should either the president of the senate or the speaker of the house serve as acting governor, that person may not activrly serve at the same time as senator or representative?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
140,400 |
67.8% |
No
|
79,609 |
32.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
220,009 |
See Details » |
|
1980 |
3 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to reflect the fact that governor's councilors are elected from councilor districts instead of from counties?See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
104,268 |
53.6% |
No
|
106,232 |
46.4% |
Total Votes Cast |
210,500 |
See Details » |
|
1978 |
1 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that all persons have the right tokeep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property and the state but authorizing the legislature to prescribe the manner in which they may be borne and to prohibit convicted felons fro...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
160,628 |
64.7% |
No
|
87,807 |
35.3% |
Total Votes Cast |
248,435 |
See Details » |
|
1978 |
2 |
Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for annual sessions of the legislature and to allow mileage payments for actual attendance for a maximum of 90 legislative days per biennium? (This constitutional amendment was passed by the New Hampshire House of Representatives, 311 Yes vote...See Details » |
Statewide |
Statewide |
Response |
Vote Count |
% |
Yes
|
157,272 |
65.8% |
No
|
81,622 |
34.2% |
Total Votes Cast |
238,894 |
| |