Please wait...
Year Q # Question Type Locality/District Results
2014 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		122 64.6%
No
 67 35.4%
Total Votes Cast 189 See Details »
2014 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		135 71.8%
No
 53 28.2%
Total Votes Cast 188 See Details »
2014 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		135 71.8%
No
 53 28.2%
Total Votes Cast 188 See Details »
2014 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		137 73.7%
No
 49 26.3%
Total Votes Cast 186 See Details »
2014 Polling hours in the town of Jefferson are now 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in September 13, 2016?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 76 31.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		169 69.0%
Total Votes Cast 245 See Details »
2014 Polling hours in the town of Monroe are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in September 13, 2016?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 138 43.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		181 56.7%
Total Votes Cast 319 See Details »
2012 Polling hours in the town of Lyman are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in September 9, 2014?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 111 40.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		163 59.5%
Total Votes Cast 274 See Details »
2012 Polling hours in the town of Stratham are now 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in September 9, 2014?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 2,068 46.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		2,394 53.7%
Total Votes Cast 4,462 See Details »
2012 1 Are you in favor of amending the second part of the constitution by inserting after article 5-b a new article to read as follows: "[Art.] 5-c. [Income Tax Prohibited.] Notwithstanding any general or special provision of this constitution, the general court shall not have the power or authority to ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 355,054 57.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		266,883 42.9%
Total Votes Cast 621,937 See Details »
2012 2 Are you in favor of amending article 73-a of the second part of the constitution to read as follows: "[Art.] 73-a [Supreme Court, Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. The chief justice shall, with the concurrence of a majority ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 294,164 48.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		308,094 51.2%
Total Votes Cast 602,258 See Details »
2012 3 Shall there be a convention to amend or revise the Constitution?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 215,679 36.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		384,014 64.0%
Total Votes Cast 599,693 See Details »
2010 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 153 42.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		207 57.5%
Total Votes Cast 360 See Details »
2010 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		226 62.4%
No
 136 37.6%
Total Votes Cast 362 See Details »
2010 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		232 63.9%
No
 131 36.1%
Total Votes Cast 363 See Details »
2010 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		234 64.5%
No
 129 35.5%
Total Votes Cast 363 See Details »
2010 Polling hours in the town of Hampstead are now 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2012?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 79 23.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		263 76.9%
Total Votes Cast 342 See Details »
2010 Polling hours in the town of Lisbon are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2012?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 1,542 47.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,678 52.1%
Total Votes Cast 3,220 See Details »
2010 Polling hours in the town of Peterborough are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2012?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		2,065 83.4%
No
 412 16.6%
Total Votes Cast 2,477 See Details »
2008 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		111 50.9%
No
 107 49.1%
Total Votes Cast 218 See Details »
2008 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		125 59.8%
No
 84 40.2%
Total Votes Cast 209 See Details »
2008 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		137 62.6%
No
 82 37.4%
Total Votes Cast 219 See Details »
2008 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		131 59.8%
No
 88 40.2%
Total Votes Cast 219 See Details »
2008 Polling hours in the town of Fremont are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 7:00 a.m. and close at 8:00 p.m. for all regular elections beginning in 2010?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,864 87.1%
No
 277 12.9%
Total Votes Cast 2,141 See Details »
2008 Polling hours in the town of Harrisville are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2010?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 114 18.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		502 81.5%
Total Votes Cast 616 See Details »
2006 1 Are you in favor of amending the first part of the constitution by inserting a new article 12-a to provide that private property can only be taken as follows: "[Art.] 12-a [Power to Take Property Limited.] No part of a person's property shall be taken by eminent domain and transferred, directly or i...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		316,005 85.7%
No
 52,893 14.3%
Total Votes Cast 368,898 See Details »
2006 2 Are you in favor of amending the second part of the Constitution by amending article 11 to read as follows: "[Art.] 11. [Small Towns; Representative by Districts.] When the population of any town or ward, according to the last federal census, is within a reasonable deviation from the ideal populatio...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		240,767 70.5%
No
 100,688 29.5%
Total Votes Cast 341,455 See Details »
2006 Polling hours in the town of Franconia are now 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular elections beginning in 2008?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 91 18.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		394 81.2%
Total Votes Cast 485 See Details »
2004 Are you in favor of repealing and reenacting part II, article 73-a of the constitution in order to clarify that both the judiciary and legislature have the authority to regulate court practices and procedures and to resolve potential conflicts that may arise so that it reads as follows: "[Art.] 7...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 271,091 56.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		205,589 43.1%
Total Votes Cast 476,680 See Details »
2004 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		130 69.5%
No
 57 30.5%
Total Votes Cast 187 See Details »
2004 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		165 88.2%
No
 22 11.8%
Total Votes Cast 187 See Details »
2004 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		162 86.6%
No
 25 13.4%
Total Votes Cast 187 See Details »
2004 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		147 79.0%
No
 39 21.0%
Total Votes Cast 186 See Details »
2004 Polling hours in the town of Stratford are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2006?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		141 54.0%
No
 120 46.0%
Total Votes Cast 261 See Details »
2002 1 Shall there be a convention to amend or revise the constitution?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		221,588 63.1%
No
 129,579 36.9%
Total Votes Cast 351,167 See Details »
2002 2 Are you in favor of amending article 73-a of the second part of the constitution to read as follows: [Art.] 73-a. [Supreme Court Administration.] The chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of all the courts. The chief justice shall, with the concurrence of a majority o...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 177,721 49.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		184,042 50.9%
Total Votes Cast 361,763 See Details »
2002 Polling hours in the town of Columbia are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		104 61.5%
No
 65 38.5%
Total Votes Cast 169 See Details »
2002 Polling hours in the town of Dummer are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		71 59.7%
No
 48 40.3%
Total Votes Cast 119 See Details »
2002 Polling hours in the town of Errol are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 52 49.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		54 50.9%
Total Votes Cast 106 See Details »
2002 Polling hours in the town of Jefferson are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 114 31.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		244 68.2%
Total Votes Cast 358 See Details »
2002 Polling hours in the town of Monroe are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 124 41.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		177 58.8%
Total Votes Cast 301 See Details »
2002 Polling hours in the town of Pittsburg are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		152 54.1%
No
 129 45.9%
Total Votes Cast 281 See Details »
2002 Polling hours in the town of Springfield are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 127 30.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		297 70.0%
Total Votes Cast 424 See Details »
2002 Polling hours in the town of Sugar Hill are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:30 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2004?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		213 71.2%
No
 86 28.8%
Total Votes Cast 299 See Details »
2000 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that municipalities shall have home rule authority to exercise such powers and perform such functions pertaining to its government and affairs which are not prohibited by the state constitution, state statute, or common law, and that the state...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 202,367 48.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		218,875 52.0%
Total Votes Cast 421,242 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Alexandria are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 178 31.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		384 68.3%
Total Votes Cast 562 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Brookfield are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 97 30.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		218 69.2%
Total Votes Cast 315 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Croydon are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 89 31.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		196 68.8%
Total Votes Cast 285 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Dalton are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 117 33.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		228 66.1%
Total Votes Cast 345 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Danbury are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 142 30.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		321 69.3%
Total Votes Cast 463 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Dummer are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 70 45.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		85 54.8%
Total Votes Cast 155 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Franconia are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 160 30.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		374 70.0%
Total Votes Cast 534 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Gilsum are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 92 31.4%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		201 68.6%
Total Votes Cast 293 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Hill are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 102 26.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		278 73.2%
Total Votes Cast 380 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Hinsdale are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 236 21.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		889 79.0%
Total Votes Cast 1,125 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Langdon are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 86 32.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		182 67.9%
Total Votes Cast 268 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Lempster are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 123 33.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		248 66.8%
Total Votes Cast 371 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Lincoln are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 6:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 108 17.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		529 83.0%
Total Votes Cast 637 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Lyman are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 91 42.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		125 57.9%
Total Votes Cast 216 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Madbury are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 161 20.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		638 79.8%
Total Votes Cast 799 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Marlborough are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 249 27.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		645 72.1%
Total Votes Cast 894 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Marlow are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 103 28.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		257 71.4%
Total Votes Cast 360 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Milan are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 152 27.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		408 72.9%
Total Votes Cast 560 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Newbury are now 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 8:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 235 25.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		679 74.3%
Total Votes Cast 914 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Orford are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 120 26.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		342 74.0%
Total Votes Cast 462 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Plainfield are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 194 18.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		874 81.8%
Total Votes Cast 1,068 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Richmond are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 153 32.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		317 67.4%
Total Votes Cast 470 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Salisbury are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 223 38.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		350 61.1%
Total Votes Cast 573 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Sandwich are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 217 29.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		523 70.7%
Total Votes Cast 740 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Stoddard are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 124 27.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		336 73.0%
Total Votes Cast 460 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Stratford are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 90 43.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		119 56.9%
Total Votes Cast 209 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Sugar Hill are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:30 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 125 38.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		200 61.5%
Total Votes Cast 325 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Troy are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 180 19.4%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		749 80.6%
Total Votes Cast 929 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Wentworth are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 128 39.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		196 60.5%
Total Votes Cast 324 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Westmoreland are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 234 30.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		531 69.4%
Total Votes Cast 765 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Whitefield are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 11:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 165 20.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		650 79.8%
Total Votes Cast 815 See Details »
2000 Polling hours in the town of Woodstock are now 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Shall we change polling hours so that the polls shall open at 10:00 a.m. and close at 7:00 p.m. for all regular state elections beginning in 2002?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 153 29.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		363 70.3%
Total Votes Cast 516 See Details »
1998 1 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the minimum age requirement for state senator shall be changed from 30 to 25 years of age? (Passed by the N.H. House 323 Yes 29 No; Passed by State Senate 15 Yes 6 No) CACR22See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 119,104 41.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		169,439 58.7%
Total Votes Cast 288,543 See Details »
1998 2 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to make it more inclusive by changing specific references to the governor and other people to gender neutral terms? (Passed by the N.H. House 303 Yes 26 No; Passed by State Senate 24 Yes 0 No) CACR18See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 159,308 56.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		121,441 43.3%
Total Votes Cast 280,749 See Details »
1998 Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 144 40.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		213 59.7%
Total Votes Cast 357 See Details »
1998 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 115 32.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		243 67.9%
Total Votes Cast 358 See Details »
1998 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 135 37.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		224 62.4%
Total Votes Cast 359 See Details »
1998 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 133 36.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		229 63.3%
Total Votes Cast 362 See Details »
1998 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 88 24.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		270 75.4%
Total Votes Cast 358 See Details »
1996 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		125 53.0%
No
 111 47.0%
Total Votes Cast 236 See Details »
1996 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		181 74.5%
No
 62 25.5%
Total Votes Cast 243 See Details »
1996 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		178 73.6%
No
 64 26.4%
Total Votes Cast 242 See Details »
1996 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		131 55.5%
No
 105 44.5%
Total Votes Cast 236 See Details »
1994 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 97 28.4%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		245 71.6%
Total Votes Cast 342 See Details »
1994 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 105 30.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		236 69.2%
Total Votes Cast 341 See Details »
1994 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 109 31.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		236 68.4%
Total Votes Cast 345 See Details »
1994 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 75 21.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		267 78.1%
Total Votes Cast 342 See Details »
1994 Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		197 68.2%
No
 92 31.8%
Total Votes Cast 289 See Details »
1994 Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 128 37.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		215 62.7%
Total Votes Cast 343 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Barnstead at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		657 86.1%
No
 106 13.9%
Total Votes Cast 763 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Belmont at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,063 0.0%
No
 232 100.0%
Total Votes Cast 1,295 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Center Harbor at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		225 73.1%
No
 83 26.9%
Total Votes Cast 308 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Gilmanton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		562 76.7%
No
 171 23.3%
Total Votes Cast 733 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in New Hampton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		351 73.0%
No
 130 27.0%
Total Votes Cast 481 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Sanbornton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		594 82.6%
No
 125 17.4%
Total Votes Cast 719 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Tilton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		595 81.8%
No
 132 18.2%
Total Votes Cast 727 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Albany at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		82 59.4%
No
 56 40.6%
Total Votes Cast 138 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Bartlett at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		698 90.1%
No
 77 9.9%
Total Votes Cast 775 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Brookfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		133 64.9%
No
 72 35.1%
Total Votes Cast 205 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Chatham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 25 36.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		44 63.8%
Total Votes Cast 69 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Eaton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 58 46.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		66 53.2%
Total Votes Cast 124 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Effingham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		126 100.0%
No
 111 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 237 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Freedom at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		345 83.7%
No
 67 16.3%
Total Votes Cast 412 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hart's Location at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 6 31.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		13 68.4%
Total Votes Cast 19 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Jackson at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		221 70.2%
No
 94 29.8%
Total Votes Cast 315 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Madison at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		400 81.6%
No
 90 18.4%
Total Votes Cast 490 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Moultonborough at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,019 87.4%
No
 147 12.6%
Total Votes Cast 1,166 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Ossipee at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		666 82.8%
No
 138 17.2%
Total Votes Cast 804 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Sandwich at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		388 75.8%
No
 124 24.2%
Total Votes Cast 512 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Tamworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		472 81.4%
No
 108 18.6%
Total Votes Cast 580 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Tuftonboro at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		514 77.9%
No
 146 22.1%
Total Votes Cast 660 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Wakefield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		878 85.1%
No
 154 14.9%
Total Votes Cast 1,032 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Wolfeboro at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,396 0.0%
No
 196 100.0%
Total Votes Cast 1,592 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Alstead at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		353 63.1%
No
 206 36.9%
Total Votes Cast 559 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Chesterfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		680 82.6%
No
 143 17.4%
Total Votes Cast 823 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Dublin at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		411 77.3%
No
 121 22.7%
Total Votes Cast 532 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Fitzwilliam at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		344 71.5%
No
 137 28.5%
Total Votes Cast 481 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Gilsum at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		84 53.2%
No
 74 46.8%
Total Votes Cast 158 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Harrisville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		224 67.3%
No
 109 32.7%
Total Votes Cast 333 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hinsdale at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		518 81.1%
No
 121 18.9%
Total Votes Cast 639 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Jaffrey at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,035 85.5%
No
 175 14.5%
Total Votes Cast 1,210 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Keene at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		4,426 88.0%
No
 602 12.0%
Total Votes Cast 5,028 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Marlborough at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		367 71.4%
No
 147 28.6%
Total Votes Cast 514 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Marlow at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		126 53.4%
No
 110 46.6%
Total Votes Cast 236 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Nelson at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		108 58.4%
No
 77 41.6%
Total Votes Cast 185 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Richmond at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		136 50.9%
No
 131 49.1%
Total Votes Cast 267 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Roxbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 12 16.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		62 83.8%
Total Votes Cast 74 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Stoddard at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		123 60.6%
No
 80 39.4%
Total Votes Cast 203 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Sullivan at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		82 52.9%
No
 73 47.1%
Total Votes Cast 155 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Surry at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 81 40.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		119 59.5%
Total Votes Cast 200 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Swanzey at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,276 90.2%
No
 138 9.8%
Total Votes Cast 1,414 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Troy at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		336 75.7%
No
 108 24.3%
Total Votes Cast 444 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Walpole at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		843 80.1%
No
 209 19.9%
Total Votes Cast 1,052 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Westmoreland at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		360 70.7%
No
 149 29.3%
Total Votes Cast 509 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Winchester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		619 84.7%
No
 112 15.3%
Total Votes Cast 731 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Berlin at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		2,129 76.6%
No
 649 23.4%
Total Votes Cast 2,778 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Carroll at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		137 66.8%
No
 68 33.2%
Total Votes Cast 205 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Clarksville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 24 40.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		35 59.3%
Total Votes Cast 59 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Colebrook at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		379 75.2%
No
 125 24.8%
Total Votes Cast 504 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Columbia at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		77 67.5%
No
 37 32.5%
Total Votes Cast 114 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Dalton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		143 65.0%
No
 77 35.0%
Total Votes Cast 220 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Dixville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 1 6.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		14 93.3%
Total Votes Cast 15 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Dummer at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		52 55.9%
No
 41 44.1%
Total Votes Cast 93 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Errol at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		54 69.2%
No
 24 30.8%
Total Votes Cast 78 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Gorham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		665 81.9%
No
 147 18.1%
Total Votes Cast 812 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Jefferson at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		198 67.6%
No
 95 32.4%
Total Votes Cast 293 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Lancaster at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		758 87.6%
No
 107 12.4%
Total Votes Cast 865 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Milan at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		207 74.2%
No
 72 25.8%
Total Votes Cast 279 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Millsfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 1 20.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		4 80.0%
Total Votes Cast 5 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Northumberland at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		378 74.1%
No
 132 25.9%
Total Votes Cast 510 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Pittsburg at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		137 66.2%
No
 70 33.8%
Total Votes Cast 207 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Randolph at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 66 33.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		133 66.8%
Total Votes Cast 199 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Shelburne at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 61 44.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		76 55.5%
Total Votes Cast 137 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Stark at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		58 56.3%
No
 45 43.7%
Total Votes Cast 103 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Stewartstown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		89 60.5%
No
 58 39.5%
Total Votes Cast 147 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Stratford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		92 69.7%
No
 40 30.3%
Total Votes Cast 132 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Whitefield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		423 85.1%
No
 74 14.9%
Total Votes Cast 497 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Alexandria at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		207 63.9%
No
 117 36.1%
Total Votes Cast 324 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Ashland at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		347 79.6%
No
 89 20.4%
Total Votes Cast 436 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Bath at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		148 67.9%
No
 70 32.1%
Total Votes Cast 218 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Benton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 35 47.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		38 52.1%
Total Votes Cast 73 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Bethlehem at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		437 84.7%
No
 79 15.3%
Total Votes Cast 516 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Bridgewater at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 140 40.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		202 59.1%
Total Votes Cast 342 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Bristol at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		613 78.8%
No
 165 21.2%
Total Votes Cast 778 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Campton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		491 74.2%
No
 171 25.8%
Total Votes Cast 662 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Canaan at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		627 83.2%
No
 127 16.8%
Total Votes Cast 754 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Dorchester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		62 57.9%
No
 45 42.1%
Total Votes Cast 107 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Easton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 33 34.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		62 65.3%
Total Votes Cast 95 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Ellsworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 12 38.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		19 61.3%
Total Votes Cast 31 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Enfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		798 88.2%
No
 107 11.8%
Total Votes Cast 905 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Franconia at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		235 69.3%
No
 104 30.7%
Total Votes Cast 339 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Grafton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		172 71.1%
No
 70 28.9%
Total Votes Cast 242 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Groton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		63 62.4%
No
 38 37.6%
Total Votes Cast 101 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hebron at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 89 42.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		120 57.4%
Total Votes Cast 209 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Holderness at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		467 82.2%
No
 101 17.8%
Total Votes Cast 568 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Landaff at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 35 38.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		56 61.5%
Total Votes Cast 91 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Lincoln at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		247 75.8%
No
 79 24.2%
Total Votes Cast 326 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Lisbon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		224 73.7%
No
 80 26.3%
Total Votes Cast 304 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Lyman at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		70 56.9%
No
 53 43.1%
Total Votes Cast 123 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Monroe at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		228 68.7%
No
 104 31.3%
Total Votes Cast 332 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Orange at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 34 38.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		55 61.8%
Total Votes Cast 89 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Orford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		195 70.4%
No
 82 29.6%
Total Votes Cast 277 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Piermont at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		123 61.8%
No
 76 38.2%
Total Votes Cast 199 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Plymouth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		858 77.2%
No
 254 22.8%
Total Votes Cast 1,112 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Rumney at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		321 67.4%
No
 155 32.6%
Total Votes Cast 476 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Sugar Hill at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		153 61.2%
No
 97 38.8%
Total Votes Cast 250 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Thornton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		379 78.1%
No
 106 21.9%
Total Votes Cast 485 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Warren at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		123 69.1%
No
 55 30.9%
Total Votes Cast 178 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Waterville Valley at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 30 30.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		68 69.4%
Total Votes Cast 98 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Wentworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		109 56.2%
No
 85 43.8%
Total Votes Cast 194 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Woodstock at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		216 76.6%
No
 66 23.4%
Total Votes Cast 282 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Antrim at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		543 80.3%
No
 133 19.7%
Total Votes Cast 676 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Bennington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		299 90.3%
No
 32 9.7%
Total Votes Cast 331 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Brookline at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		750 85.1%
No
 131 14.9%
Total Votes Cast 881 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Deering at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		303 76.1%
No
 95 23.9%
Total Votes Cast 398 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Francestown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		409 81.0%
No
 96 19.0%
Total Votes Cast 505 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Greenfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		289 82.6%
No
 61 17.4%
Total Votes Cast 350 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Greenville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		334 84.1%
No
 63 15.9%
Total Votes Cast 397 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hancock at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		620 91.9%
No
 55 8.1%
Total Votes Cast 675 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hillsborough at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		898 86.1%
No
 145 13.9%
Total Votes Cast 1,043 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Lyndeborough at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		272 73.1%
No
 100 26.9%
Total Votes Cast 372 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Mason at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		206 65.4%
No
 109 34.6%
Total Votes Cast 315 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Mont Vernon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		480 84.4%
No
 89 15.6%
Total Votes Cast 569 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in New Ipswich at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		776 81.3%
No
 179 18.7%
Total Votes Cast 955 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Pelham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,750 84.1%
No
 332 15.9%
Total Votes Cast 2,082 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Sharon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 50 44.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		63 55.8%
Total Votes Cast 113 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Temple at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		243 68.8%
No
 110 31.2%
Total Votes Cast 353 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Wilton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		812 83.7%
No
 158 16.3%
Total Votes Cast 970 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Windsor at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 13 33.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		26 66.7%
Total Votes Cast 39 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Allenstown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		802 81.8%
No
 178 18.2%
Total Votes Cast 980 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Andover at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		398 75.7%
No
 128 24.3%
Total Votes Cast 526 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Boscawen at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		615 84.2%
No
 115 15.8%
Total Votes Cast 730 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Bow at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,903 82.1%
No
 416 17.9%
Total Votes Cast 2,319 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Bradford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		396 75.9%
No
 126 24.1%
Total Votes Cast 522 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Chichester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		508 87.4%
No
 73 12.6%
Total Votes Cast 581 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Danbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		153 59.5%
No
 104 40.5%
Total Votes Cast 257 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Dunbarton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		455 77.0%
No
 136 23.0%
Total Votes Cast 591 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Epsom at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		755 85.3%
No
 130 14.7%
Total Votes Cast 885 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Franklin at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,306 81.8%
No
 290 18.2%
Total Votes Cast 1,596 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Henniker at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		940 84.2%
No
 177 15.8%
Total Votes Cast 1,117 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hill at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		136 64.5%
No
 75 35.5%
Total Votes Cast 211 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hooksett at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,540 69.9%
No
 662 30.1%
Total Votes Cast 2,202 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Loudon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		803 88.2%
No
 107 11.8%
Total Votes Cast 910 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Newbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		403 76.6%
No
 123 23.4%
Total Votes Cast 526 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in New London at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,271 84.5%
No
 233 15.5%
Total Votes Cast 1,504 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Northfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		651 83.5%
No
 129 16.5%
Total Votes Cast 780 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Pittsfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		572 85.9%
No
 94 14.1%
Total Votes Cast 666 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Salisbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		240 68.2%
No
 112 31.8%
Total Votes Cast 352 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Sutton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		382 77.6%
No
 110 22.4%
Total Votes Cast 492 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Warner at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		672 86.2%
No
 108 13.8%
Total Votes Cast 780 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Webster at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		276 60.4%
No
 181 39.6%
Total Votes Cast 457 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Wilmot at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		226 64.6%
No
 124 35.4%
Total Votes Cast 350 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Atkinson at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,318 85.6%
No
 222 14.4%
Total Votes Cast 1,540 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Brentwood at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		517 81.3%
No
 119 18.7%
Total Votes Cast 636 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Candia at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		758 81.6%
No
 171 18.4%
Total Votes Cast 929 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Chester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		677 85.1%
No
 119 14.9%
Total Votes Cast 796 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Danville at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		479 81.5%
No
 109 18.5%
Total Votes Cast 588 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in East Kingston at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		297 72.8%
No
 111 27.2%
Total Votes Cast 408 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Epping at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,001 84.0%
No
 190 16.0%
Total Votes Cast 1,191 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Fremont at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		509 83.7%
No
 99 16.3%
Total Votes Cast 608 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Greenland at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		679 86.5%
No
 106 13.5%
Total Votes Cast 785 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hampstead at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,374 84.9%
No
 244 15.1%
Total Votes Cast 1,618 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Hampton Falls at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		592 84.7%
No
 107 15.3%
Total Votes Cast 699 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Kensington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		398 79.1%
No
 105 20.9%
Total Votes Cast 503 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Kingston at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,004 81.3%
No
 231 18.7%
Total Votes Cast 1,235 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in New Castle at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 206 48.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		222 51.9%
Total Votes Cast 428 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Newfields at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		250 75.3%
No
 82 24.7%
Total Votes Cast 332 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Newington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		134 62.0%
No
 82 38.0%
Total Votes Cast 216 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Newton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		553 80.5%
No
 134 19.5%
Total Votes Cast 687 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Northwood at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		573 83.9%
No
 110 16.1%
Total Votes Cast 683 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Nottingham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		656 90.1%
No
 72 9.9%
Total Votes Cast 728 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Raymond at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,396 84.5%
No
 256 15.5%
Total Votes Cast 1,652 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Rye at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,506 89.0%
No
 186 11.0%
Total Votes Cast 1,692 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Sandown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		796 83.4%
No
 159 16.6%
Total Votes Cast 955 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in South Hampton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 137 47.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		153 52.8%
Total Votes Cast 290 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Windham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		2,110 89.0%
No
 262 11.0%
Total Votes Cast 2,372 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Barrington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,200 84.9%
No
 213 15.1%
Total Votes Cast 1,413 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Farmington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		710 87.5%
No
 101 12.5%
Total Votes Cast 811 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Madbury at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		343 75.4%
No
 112 24.6%
Total Votes Cast 455 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Middleton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		120 64.5%
No
 66 35.5%
Total Votes Cast 186 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Milton at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		560 82.7%
No
 117 17.3%
Total Votes Cast 677 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in New Durham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		384 81.2%
No
 89 18.8%
Total Votes Cast 473 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Rochester at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		5,479 87.9%
No
 757 12.1%
Total Votes Cast 6,236 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Rollinsford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		541 78.4%
No
 149 21.6%
Total Votes Cast 690 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Somersworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,810 83.4%
No
 359 16.6%
Total Votes Cast 2,169 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Strafford at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		598 82.7%
No
 125 17.3%
Total Votes Cast 723 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Acworth at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		141 58.3%
No
 101 41.7%
Total Votes Cast 242 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Charlestown at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		649 83.6%
No
 127 16.4%
Total Votes Cast 776 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Claremont at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		2,853 88.4%
No
 376 11.6%
Total Votes Cast 3,229 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Cornish at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		450 77.5%
No
 131 22.5%
Total Votes Cast 581 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Croydon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		128 67.4%
No
 62 32.6%
Total Votes Cast 190 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Goshen at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		167 65.2%
No
 89 34.8%
Total Votes Cast 256 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Grantham at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		544 82.2%
No
 118 17.8%
Total Votes Cast 662 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Langdon at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		96 58.9%
No
 67 41.1%
Total Votes Cast 163 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Lempster at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		154 50.3%
No
 152 49.7%
Total Votes Cast 306 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Newport at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,034 83.9%
No
 199 16.1%
Total Votes Cast 1,233 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Plainfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		542 79.4%
No
 141 20.6%
Total Votes Cast 683 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Springfield at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		211 70.1%
No
 90 29.9%
Total Votes Cast 301 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Sunapee at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		920 85.1%
No
 161 14.9%
Total Votes Cast 1,081 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Unity at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		254 73.6%
No
 91 26.4%
Total Votes Cast 345 See Details »
1994 Shall we adopt polling hours in Washington at all state elections beginning with the 1996 state primary election under which the polls shall open not later than 8 o'clock in the morning?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		155 66.8%
No
 77 33.2%
Total Votes Cast 232 See Details »
1992 1 Shall there be a convention to amend or revise the constitution?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 210,346 49.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		217,575 51.0%
Total Votes Cast 427,921 See Details »
1992 2 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that 12-person juries shall be required in capital cases and in cases in which imprisonment may exceed one year; but that, in civil cases and in cases in which imprisonment may be one year or less, a 6-person jury shall be required? (Passed by...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 278,998 61.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		178,817 39.0%
Total Votes Cast 457,815 See Details »
1992 3 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the legislature may delegate regulatory authority to executive branch officials, but that any proposed rules may be disapproved by the legislature or an appropriate legislative committee, as prescribed by law? (Passed by N.H. House 331 Ye...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 208,301 47.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		225,276 52.2%
Total Votes Cast 433,577 See Details »
1992 4 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to allow members of a military reserve or national guard unit occasionally called upon to serve in an emergency to hold the state office of governor, senator, representative, or executive councilor? (Passed by N.H. House 319 Yes 10 No, passed State Senat...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 249,759 54.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		204,475 45.1%
Total Votes Cast 454,234 See Details »
1992 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 142 33.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		282 66.5%
Total Votes Cast 424 See Details »
1992 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 140 34.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		270 65.9%
Total Votes Cast 410 See Details »
1992 Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 185 43.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		240 56.5%
Total Votes Cast 425 See Details »
1990 1 Are you in favor of amending the constitution by providing that all moneys received from any state-run lottery and all interest received on such moneys, after deducting the necessary cost of administration, shall be used exclusively for the purpose of state aid to education? (Passed by N.H. House, 3...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		199,229 88.4%
No
 26,336 11.6%
Total Votes Cast 225,565 See Details »
1990 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 118 30.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		264 69.1%
Total Votes Cast 382 See Details »
1990 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 118 31.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		261 68.9%
Total Votes Cast 379 See Details »
1990 Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 127 33.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		256 66.8%
Total Votes Cast 383 See Details »
1988 1 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that, in order to entitle the parties to a trial by jury in civil cases, the amount involved in such cases must exceed $1,500 instead of $500 as is now provided? (Passed by N.H, House, 302 Yes 23 No, passed State Senate 18 Yes 3 No) (CACR 4)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		250,413 70.0%
No
 108,267 30.0%
Total Votes Cast 358,680 See Details »
1988 2 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the legislature may delegate regulatory authority to executive branch officials, but that any proposed rules may be disapproved by the legislature or an appropriate legislative committee, as prescribed by law? (Passed by N.H. House, 342 Y...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 184,434 55.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		149,303 44.7%
Total Votes Cast 333,737 See Details »
1988 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Monroe?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 170 45.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		205 54.7%
Total Votes Cast 375 See Details »
1988 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Monroe?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		242 62.1%
No
 148 37.9%
Total Votes Cast 390 See Details »
1988 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Monroe?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		240 62.2%
No
 146 37.8%
Total Votes Cast 386 See Details »
1988 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Monroe?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 161 43.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		212 56.8%
Total Votes Cast 373 See Details »
1988 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Temple?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 160 44.2%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		202 55.8%
Total Votes Cast 362 See Details »
1988 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Temple?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		265 73.2%
No
 97 26.8%
Total Votes Cast 362 See Details »
1988 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Temple?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		258 72.1%
No
 100 27.9%
Total Votes Cast 358 See Details »
1988 Shall liquor be sold for consumption on the premises where sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Temple?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		204 56.7%
No
 156 43.3%
Total Votes Cast 360 See Details »
1988 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in the town of Sandwich?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		377 59.5%
No
 257 40.5%
Total Votes Cast 634 See Details »
1986 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the amount in controversy required in order for a party to certain civil suits to be entitled to a jury trial shall be determined by law? (Passed by the N.H. House, 316 Yes 13 No, passed State Senate 23 Yes 0 No)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 107,481 64.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		59,835 35.5%
Total Votes Cast 167,316 See Details »
1984 1 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that voting registration and polling places shall be easily accessible to all qualified persons including disabled and elderly persons? (Passed by a vote of 266 Yes, 44 No)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		306,771 85.3%
No
 52,826 14.7%
Total Votes Cast 359,597 See Details »
1984 2 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to prohibit the state from mandating or assigning any new, expanded, or modified programs or responsibilities which require additional local expenditures to any political subdivision, unless such programs or responsibilities are either fully funded by th...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		237,210 70.3%
No
 99,609 29.7%
Total Votes Cast 336,819 See Details »
1984 3 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that no footnote or section of any budget bill before the legislature shall contain any provision which establishes, amends or repeals statutory law, other than provisions establishing, amending or repealing operating and capital expenses for ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		262,572 80.7%
No
 62,047 19.3%
Total Votes Cast 324,619 See Details »
1984 4 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to change the size of New Hampshire's legislative bodies without changing the total number of legislators by decreasing the current size of the House of Representatives by 12, to 388 members, and increasing the current size of the Senate by 12, to 36 mem...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 204,123 61.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		127,682 38.2%
Total Votes Cast 331,805 See Details »
1984 5 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for annual sessions of the legislature; and to restrict mileage payments for actual attendance on legislative days to a maximum of 45 legislative days per session but not after the first day of July of each year? (Passed by a vote of 278 Yes, ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 247,257 65.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		85,314 34.5%
Total Votes Cast 332,571 See Details »
1984 6 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to reduce the age requirement for persons being elected to the office of state senator or executive councilor from 30 years of age to 25 years of age? (Passed by a vote of 279 Yes, 66 No)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 169,158 42.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		180,017 57.9%
Total Votes Cast 349,175 See Details »
1984 7 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that, in order to commit a person in a criminal insanity proceeding, the state must establish that the person is potentially dangerous to himself or to others and suffers from a mental disorder by a standard of "clear and convincing evidence" ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		258,452 75.7%
No
 82,736 24.3%
Total Votes Cast 341,188 See Details »
1984 8 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that, in order to entitle the parties to a trial by jury in civil cases, the amount involved in such cases must exceed $5,000 instead of $500 as is now provided? (Passed by a vote of 288 Yes, 60 No)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 217,717 64.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		121,222 35.7%
Total Votes Cast 338,939 See Details »
1984 9 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to eliminate the power of the governor and council to prorogue (that is, to extend) a recess of the legislature, without its consent, for up to 90 days? (Passed by a vote of 251 Yes, 89 No)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 204,745 62.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		122,909 37.4%
Total Votes Cast 327,654 See Details »
1984 10 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that all the assets of both the New Hampshire retirement system and any other retirement system for public officers and employees operated by the state or its political subdivisions shall be used exclusively for the benefit of any such retirem...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		288,994 85.5%
No
 48,690 14.5%
Total Votes Cast 337,684 See Details »
1984 A Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to change the date on which the votes for councilors are laid before the house of representatives and senate to the first Wednesday following the first Tuesday in January? (Passed by the N.H. House, 300 Yes 0 No, passed State Senate 21 Yes 0 No)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		215,083 76.6%
No
 65,480 23.4%
Total Votes Cast 280,563 See Details »
1984 B Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that in the event of a vacancy in the office of governor or the incapacity of the governor to perform his duties, the president of the senate, speaker of the house, secretary of state and state treasurer, in that order, shall be acting governo...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		247,393 88.2%
No
 44,763 11.8%
Total Votes Cast 292,156 See Details »
1984 C Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for electing the governor every four years, with a limitation of 2 consecutive terms?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 193,506 55.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		110,700 44.1%
Total Votes Cast 304,206 See Details »
1982 1 Shall there be a convention to amend the constitution?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		115,351 56.5%
No
 105,207 43.5%
Total Votes Cast 220,558 See Details »
1982 2 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that the Secretary of State shall lay the votes for Governor before the senate and house of representatives on the first Wednesday following the first Tuesday of January? (Passed by the N.H. House 283 Yes 1 No, passed State Senate, 20 Yes 0 No...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		148,705 95.0%
No
 61,925 5.0%
Total Votes Cast 210,630 See Details »
1982 3 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution of New Hampshire to affirm that all persons have the right to keep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property, and the state? (Passed by the N.H. House, 269 Yes 85 No, passed State Senate, 19 Yes 2 No))See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		178,791 76.5%
No
 66,441 23.5%
Total Votes Cast 245,232 See Details »
1982 4 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for electing the Governor every four years, with a limitation of two consecutive terms? (Passed by the N.H. House, 329 Yes 12 No, passed State Senate, 20 Yes 3 No)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 151,379 65.4%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		93,081 34.6%
Total Votes Cast 244,460 See Details »
1982 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 14 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		65 60.7%
No
 42 39.3%
Total Votes Cast 107 See Details »
1980 1 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution so that references in the bill of rights to "men", "man" and "man's" are changed to "people", person and "person's", respectively?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		201,251 74.6%
No
 123,901 25.4%
Total Votes Cast 325,152 See Details »
1980 2 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution by removing certain obsolete provisions and rewriting them as follows: (a) In Article 27, Part First, to allow "civil authorities" rather than "civil magistrates" to quarter troops in homes in times of war, subject to the control of the legislature? (b) ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		205,432 75.5%
No
 98,732 24.5%
Total Votes Cast 304,164 See Details »
1980 3 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to repeal Article 99 of Part Second which contains procedures for amending the Constitution now covered by Article 100 and to incorporate in Article 100 the existing provision in Article 99 for approval of constitutional amendments by two-thirds of the q...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		189,321 83.1%
No
 80,588 16.9%
Total Votes Cast 269,909 See Details »
1980 4 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to require all proposed constitutional amendments to be submitted to the voters at the next biennial November election following their proposal?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		261,660 95.0%
No
 40,899 5.0%
Total Votes Cast 302,559 See Details »
1980 5 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to require a three-fifths vote by the entire membership of the constitutional convention to propose constitutional amendments? (Passed by the N.H. House, 319 Yes 20 No, passed State Senate, 23 Yes 0 No.)See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		249,284 90.2%
No
 51,524 9.8%
Total Votes Cast 300,808 See Details »
1980 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		134 54.3%
No
 113 45.7%
Total Votes Cast 247 See Details »
1980 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		3,911 78.6%
No
 1,066 21.4%
Total Votes Cast 4,977 See Details »
1980 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		4,044 80.1%
No
 1,003 19.9%
Total Votes Cast 5,047 See Details »
1980 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		211 80.5%
No
 51 19.5%
Total Votes Cast 262 See Details »
1980 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		475 91.7%
No
 43 8.3%
Total Votes Cast 518 See Details »
1980 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		409 79.0%
No
 109 21.0%
Total Votes Cast 518 See Details »
1980 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		4,103 81.4%
No
 939 18.6%
Total Votes Cast 5,042 See Details »
1980 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		138 72.6%
No
 52 27.4%
Total Votes Cast 190 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		735 64.6%
No
 402 35.4%
Total Votes Cast 1,137 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		224 58.0%
No
 162 42.0%
Total Votes Cast 386 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		530 72.5%
No
 201 27.5%
Total Votes Cast 731 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		179 73.7%
No
 64 26.3%
Total Votes Cast 243 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,463 69.8%
No
 634 30.2%
Total Votes Cast 2,097 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 172 47.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		193 52.9%
Total Votes Cast 365 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,639 78.4%
No
 451 21.6%
Total Votes Cast 2,090 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		122 59.8%
No
 82 40.2%
Total Votes Cast 204 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 183 47.4%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		203 52.6%
Total Votes Cast 386 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		370 70.1%
No
 158 29.9%
Total Votes Cast 528 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		70 71.4%
No
 28 28.6%
Total Votes Cast 98 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		412 68.8%
No
 187 31.2%
Total Votes Cast 599 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		128 64.3%
No
 71 35.7%
Total Votes Cast 199 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		33 62.3%
No
 20 37.7%
Total Votes Cast 53 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		62 60.2%
No
 41 39.8%
Total Votes Cast 103 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		199 73.7%
No
 71 26.3%
Total Votes Cast 270 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Missing Data
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		8 0.0%
No
 1 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 9 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		173 70.9%
No
 71 29.1%
Total Votes Cast 244 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		315 70.6%
No
 131 29.4%
Total Votes Cast 446 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		713 72.0%
No
 277 28.0%
Total Votes Cast 990 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		410 71.8%
No
 161 28.2%
Total Votes Cast 571 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		497 68.5%
No
 229 31.5%
Total Votes Cast 726 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,072 76.3%
No
 333 23.7%
Total Votes Cast 1,405 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		128 59.3%
No
 88 40.7%
Total Votes Cast 216 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		196 51.4%
No
 185 48.6%
Total Votes Cast 381 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		209 63.9%
No
 118 36.1%
Total Votes Cast 327 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		71 61.7%
No
 44 38.3%
Total Votes Cast 115 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		118 54.6%
No
 98 45.4%
Total Votes Cast 216 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		339 73.4%
No
 123 26.6%
Total Votes Cast 462 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		715 72.3%
No
 274 27.7%
Total Votes Cast 989 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		264 67.3%
No
 128 32.7%
Total Votes Cast 392 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 82 44.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		101 55.2%
Total Votes Cast 183 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		67 60.9%
No
 43 39.1%
Total Votes Cast 110 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		336 60.9%
No
 216 39.1%
Total Votes Cast 552 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		85 62.5%
No
 51 37.5%
Total Votes Cast 136 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 42 43.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		54 56.3%
Total Votes Cast 96 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		74 76.3%
No
 23 23.7%
Total Votes Cast 97 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		569 65.7%
No
 297 34.3%
Total Votes Cast 866 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		199 67.9%
No
 94 32.1%
Total Votes Cast 293 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		456 65.8%
No
 237 34.2%
Total Votes Cast 693 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		233 67.1%
No
 114 32.9%
Total Votes Cast 347 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,623 80.4%
No
 395 19.6%
Total Votes Cast 2,018 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		104 74.3%
No
 36 25.7%
Total Votes Cast 140 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		24 50.0%
No
 24 50.0%
Total Votes Cast 48 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		265 64.0%
No
 149 36.0%
Total Votes Cast 414 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		54 67.5%
No
 26 32.5%
Total Votes Cast 80 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 3 15.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		16 84.2%
Total Votes Cast 19 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		29 52.7%
No
 26 47.3%
Total Votes Cast 55 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		41 64.1%
No
 23 35.9%
Total Votes Cast 64 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		186 56.4%
No
 144 43.6%
Total Votes Cast 330 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		405 69.7%
No
 176 30.3%
Total Votes Cast 581 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		143 68.8%
No
 65 31.3%
Total Votes Cast 208 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 2 28.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		5 71.4%
Total Votes Cast 7 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		376 78.5%
No
 103 21.5%
Total Votes Cast 479 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		98 60.1%
No
 65 39.9%
Total Votes Cast 163 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		89 61.0%
No
 57 39.0%
Total Votes Cast 146 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		67 55.4%
No
 54 44.6%
Total Votes Cast 121 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		65 62.5%
No
 39 37.5%
Total Votes Cast 104 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		188 73.2%
No
 69 26.8%
Total Votes Cast 257 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		84 56.8%
No
 64 43.2%
Total Votes Cast 148 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		38 66.7%
No
 19 33.3%
Total Votes Cast 57 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		205 68.8%
No
 93 31.2%
Total Votes Cast 298 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		380 76.9%
No
 114 23.1%
Total Votes Cast 494 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		168 61.3%
No
 106 38.7%
Total Votes Cast 274 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		291 69.6%
No
 127 30.4%
Total Votes Cast 418 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		36 66.7%
No
 18 33.3%
Total Votes Cast 54 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 8 32.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		17 68.0%
Total Votes Cast 25 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		130 67.0%
No
 64 33.0%
Total Votes Cast 194 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		39 73.6%
No
 14 26.4%
Total Votes Cast 53 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,031 60.8%
No
 664 39.2%
Total Votes Cast 1,695 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		420 73.6%
No
 151 26.4%
Total Votes Cast 571 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		67 76.5%
No
 20 23.5%
Total Votes Cast 87 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		23 78.5%
No
 22 21.5%
Total Votes Cast 45 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,350 96.7%
No
 392 3.3%
Total Votes Cast 1,742 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		168 100.0%
No
 47 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 215 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		188 33.8%
No
 73 66.2%
Total Votes Cast 261 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		67 56.4%
No
 25 43.6%
Total Votes Cast 92 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		160 96.1%
No
 102 3.9%
Total Votes Cast 262 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		126 1.0%
No
 60 99.0%
Total Votes Cast 186 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 22 51.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		43 48.9%
Total Votes Cast 65 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		102 0.0%
No
 79 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 181 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		138 0.0%
No
 114 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 252 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		436 0.0%
No
 174 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 610 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		174 0.0%
No
 67 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 241 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 77 0.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		79 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 156 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		109 0.0%
No
 39 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 148 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		33 0.0%
No
 32 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 65 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		72 0.0%
No
 26 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 98 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		247 68.8%
No
 112 31.2%
Total Votes Cast 359 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,217 58.2%
No
 873 41.8%
Total Votes Cast 2,090 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		273 55.6%
No
 218 44.4%
Total Votes Cast 491 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,642 68.9%
No
 742 31.1%
Total Votes Cast 2,384 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		133 51.8%
No
 124 48.2%
Total Votes Cast 257 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		514 71.3%
No
 207 28.7%
Total Votes Cast 721 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 142 42.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		191 57.4%
Total Votes Cast 333 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		15,742 74.4%
No
 5,213 25.6%
Total Votes Cast 20,955 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 62 0.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		94 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 156 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		2,130 0.0%
No
 690 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 2,820 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,305 0.0%
No
 525 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 1,830 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		292 0.0%
No
 265 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 557 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		13,639 0.0%
No
 3,959 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 17,598 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 180 44.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		229 56.0%
Total Votes Cast 409 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 227 42.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		313 58.0%
Total Votes Cast 540 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		630 63.8%
No
 357 36.2%
Total Votes Cast 987 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 17 23.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		54 76.1%
Total Votes Cast 71 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 70 44.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		88 55.7%
Total Votes Cast 158 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		361 61.5%
No
 226 38.5%
Total Votes Cast 587 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		308 57.1%
No
 231 42.9%
Total Votes Cast 539 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 14 36.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		24 63.2%
Total Votes Cast 38 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		504 0.0%
No
 141 0.0%
Total Votes Cast 645 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		546 78.1%
No
 268 21.9%
Total Votes Cast 814 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 228 44.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		290 56.0%
Total Votes Cast 518 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		162 57.9%
No
 118 42.1%
Total Votes Cast 280 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		8,591 77.3%
No
 2,518 22.7%
Total Votes Cast 11,109 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		97 64.7%
No
 53 35.3%
Total Votes Cast 150 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		180 61.4%
No
 113 38.6%
Total Votes Cast 293 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		772 75.2%
No
 255 24.8%
Total Votes Cast 1,027 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		408 63.0%
No
 240 37.0%
Total Votes Cast 648 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		651 56.2%
No
 508 43.8%
Total Votes Cast 1,159 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		235 55.7%
No
 187 44.3%
Total Votes Cast 422 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		456 58.5%
No
 323 41.5%
Total Votes Cast 779 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		240 61.7%
No
 149 38.3%
Total Votes Cast 389 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		307 72.6%
No
 116 27.4%
Total Votes Cast 423 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		141 51.1%
No
 135 48.9%
Total Votes Cast 276 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		379 65.1%
No
 203 34.9%
Total Votes Cast 582 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		186 53.3%
No
 163 46.7%
Total Votes Cast 349 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		123 68.0%
No
 58 32.0%
Total Votes Cast 181 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		707 73.6%
No
 254 26.4%
Total Votes Cast 961 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		400 68.0%
No
 188 32.0%
Total Votes Cast 588 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 199 45.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		243 55.0%
Total Votes Cast 442 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		315 52.7%
No
 283 47.3%
Total Votes Cast 598 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		222 52.1%
No
 204 47.9%
Total Votes Cast 426 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		174 61.9%
No
 107 38.1%
Total Votes Cast 281 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		253 51.4%
No
 239 48.6%
Total Votes Cast 492 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		2,164 75.4%
No
 706 24.6%
Total Votes Cast 2,870 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		136 56.9%
No
 103 43.1%
Total Votes Cast 239 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		413 69.6%
No
 180 30.4%
Total Votes Cast 593 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		168 66.4%
No
 85 33.6%
Total Votes Cast 253 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		357 70.3%
No
 151 29.7%
Total Votes Cast 508 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		4,039 80.7%
No
 968 19.3%
Total Votes Cast 5,007 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		348 61.3%
No
 220 38.7%
Total Votes Cast 568 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		166 55.9%
No
 131 44.1%
Total Votes Cast 297 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		487 67.5%
No
 234 32.5%
Total Votes Cast 721 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		2,020 74.4%
No
 695 25.6%
Total Votes Cast 2,715 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		195 70.1%
No
 83 29.9%
Total Votes Cast 278 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		108 59.7%
No
 73 40.3%
Total Votes Cast 181 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		466 70.9%
No
 191 29.1%
Total Votes Cast 657 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		269 61.8%
No
 166 38.2%
Total Votes Cast 435 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		4,191 76.4%
No
 1,292 23.6%
Total Votes Cast 5,483 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		617 71.5%
No
 246 28.5%
Total Votes Cast 863 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		646 64.1%
No
 362 35.9%
Total Votes Cast 1,008 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		6,013 75.1%
No
 1,990 24.9%
Total Votes Cast 8,003 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		322 71.2%
No
 130 28.8%
Total Votes Cast 452 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 74 49.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		77 51.0%
Total Votes Cast 151 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		858 72.2%
No
 331 27.8%
Total Votes Cast 1,189 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		5,527 78.5%
No
 1,510 21.5%
Total Votes Cast 7,037 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,092 67.7%
No
 522 32.3%
Total Votes Cast 1,614 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		298 55.3%
No
 241 44.7%
Total Votes Cast 539 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		204 63.2%
No
 119 36.8%
Total Votes Cast 323 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,997 80.4%
No
 487 19.6%
Total Votes Cast 2,484 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		246 56.9%
No
 186 43.1%
Total Votes Cast 432 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 59 44.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		73 55.3%
Total Votes Cast 132 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		688 77.4%
No
 201 22.6%
Total Votes Cast 889 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,571 79.8%
No
 397 20.2%
Total Votes Cast 1,968 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		181 56.2%
No
 141 43.8%
Total Votes Cast 322 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		65 57.5%
No
 48 42.5%
Total Votes Cast 113 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		135 70.7%
No
 56 29.3%
Total Votes Cast 191 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		56 57.7%
No
 41 42.3%
Total Votes Cast 97 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		602 72.8%
No
 225 27.2%
Total Votes Cast 827 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		260 57.9%
No
 189 42.1%
Total Votes Cast 449 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		81 62.8%
No
 48 37.2%
Total Votes Cast 129 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		335 63.7%
No
 191 36.3%
Total Votes Cast 526 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		80 55.9%
No
 63 44.1%
Total Votes Cast 143 See Details »
1980 Shall we adopt the provisions of RSA 466:30-a which makes it unlawful for an owner of any dog licensed or unlicensed to allow said dog to run at large, except when accompanied by the owner or custodian, and when used for hunting, herding, supervised by competition and exhibition or training for such...See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 97 49.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		98 50.3%
Total Votes Cast 195 See Details »
1980 1 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to reduce the age requirements so that any qualified voter who meets residency requirements shall be eligible to be governor, governor's councilor or state senator?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 87,065 37.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		138,993 62.4%
Total Votes Cast 226,058 See Details »
1980 2 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that should either the president of the senate or the speaker of the house serve as acting governor, that person may not activrly serve at the same time as senator or representative?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		140,400 67.8%
No
 79,609 32.2%
Total Votes Cast 220,009 See Details »
1980 3 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to reflect the fact that governor's councilors are elected from councilor districts instead of from counties?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 104,268 53.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		106,232 46.4%
Total Votes Cast 210,500 See Details »
1978 1 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that all persons have the right tokeep and bear arms in defense of themselves, their families, their property and the state but authorizing the legislature to prescribe the manner in which they may be borne and to prohibit convicted felons fro...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 160,628 64.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		87,807 35.3%
Total Votes Cast 248,435 See Details »
1978 2 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for annual sessions of the legislature and to allow mileage payments for actual attendance for a maximum of 90 legislative days per biennium? (This constitutional amendment was passed by the New Hampshire House of Representatives, 311 Yes vote...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 157,272 65.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		81,622 34.2%
Total Votes Cast 238,894 See Details »
1978 3 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide a town, ward, or unincorporated place may be divided into two or more representative or senatorial districts if requested by a referendum in such town, ward, or place? (This constitutional amendments was passed by the New Hampshire House of Re...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		167,511 73.1%
No
 62,679 26.9%
Total Votes Cast 230,190 See Details »
1978 4 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that the chief justice of the supreme court shall be the administrative head of the state courts, and that he shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing procedure in the courts?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		155,920 69.2%
No
 69,244 30.8%
Total Votes Cast 225,164 See Details »
1978 5 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to allow the court to direct the trial of a defendant, at the defendant's request, to a county or judicial district in which a fair and impartial trial can be obtained when the court finds a fair and impartial trial cannot be obtained in the county or ju...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		196,290 83.3%
No
 38,319 16.7%
Total Votes Cast 234,609 See Details »
1978 6 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that the salaries of superior and supreme court judges shall not be diminished during their terms of office?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 133,806 59.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		91,014 40.4%
Total Votes Cast 224,820 See Details »
1978 7 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to reduce the residency requirement for the office of state senator and governor's councilor from seven years to four years?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 112,578 48.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		120,927 51.7%
Total Votes Cast 233,505 See Details »
1978 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		680 68.9%
No
 307 31.1%
Total Votes Cast 987 See Details »
1978 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 57 38.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		90 61.2%
Total Votes Cast 147 See Details »
1978 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 70 48.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		75 51.7%
Total Votes Cast 145 See Details »
1978 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,101 68.0%
No
 518 32.0%
Total Votes Cast 1,619 See Details »
1978 Shall wines containing not less than 6 percent nor more than 15.5 percent of alcoholic content by volume at 60 degrees Fahrenheit (table wine) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		152 71.0%
No
 62 29.0%
Total Votes Cast 214 See Details »
1978 Shall sweepstakes tickets be sold in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		83 75.5%
No
 27 24.5%
Total Votes Cast 110 See Details »
1976 1 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to remove the requirements that pensions be granted for not more than one year at a time?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 180,944 63.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		103,444 36.4%
Total Votes Cast 284,388 See Details »
1976 2 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that the public's right of access to governmental proceedings and records shall not be unreasonably restricted?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		207,722 82.6%
No
 50,155 17.4%
Total Votes Cast 257,877 See Details »
1976 3 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide for annual sessions of the legislature and to allow mileage payments for actual attendance for a maximum of ninety legislative days per biennium?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 188,567 66.4%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		95,632 33.6%
Total Votes Cast 284,199 See Details »
1976 4 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that the minimum amount in controversy for the right to a jury trial in a civil case be increased from over five hundred dollars to over three thousand dollars?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 152,541 55.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		124,879 45.0%
Total Votes Cast 277,420 See Details »
1976 5 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that a town, ward, or unincorporated place may be divided into two or more representative districts if requested by a referendum in such town, ward, or place?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 179,515 65.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		93,219 34.1%
Total Votes Cast 272,734 See Details »
1976 6 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that should a senator cease to be an inhabitant of the district for which he was chosen, he shall be disqualified to hold such position and a vacancy shall be declared?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		231,239 81.5%
No
 52,634 18.5%
Total Votes Cast 283,873 See Details »
1976 7 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution by removing certain obsolete words and phrases as follows: (a) Striking out the provisions of Articles 48, 53, 54 and 55 of Part 2 regarding the organization of the state militia and the appointment and removal of its officers which do not conform to ac...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		192,189 74.9%
No
 64,339 25.1%
Total Votes Cast 256,528 See Details »
1976 8 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to make the following changes relating to elections: (a) to reduce the minimum age of voters to eighteen; (b) to make domicile rather than being an inhabitant a prerequisite for the voting privilege; (c) to repeal certain provisions relative to voting...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		187,127 67.7%
No
 89,226 32.3%
Total Votes Cast 276,353 See Details »
1976 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		283 65.8%
No
 147 34.2%
Total Votes Cast 430 See Details »
1976 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 37 35.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		67 64.4%
Total Votes Cast 104 See Details »
1976 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		328 76.6%
No
 100 23.4%
Total Votes Cast 428 See Details »
1976 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		54 51.9%
No
 50 48.1%
Total Votes Cast 104 See Details »
1976 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		684 65.6%
No
 358 34.4%
Total Votes Cast 1,042 See Details »
1976 Shall the provisions of an act establishing commissioner districts for the purposes of the nomination and election of county commissioners in Carroll County, as passed by the 1975 session of the legislature, be adopted?See Details » County Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		3,171 79.7%
No
 808 20.3%
Total Votes Cast 3,979 See Details »
1976 1 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that the governor shall have ten days, instead of five, to act on legislation submitted to him, and 'o provide that the governor shall recall the legislature for the sole purpose of reconsidering any bills he has vetoed after it had adjourned ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 75,534 41.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		104,594 58.1%
Total Votes Cast 180,128 See Details »
1976 2 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to allow the legislature to call itself into special session with customary pay and mileage by a majority vote of each house instead of a two-thirds of each house?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 63,973 35.6%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		115,800 64.4%
Total Votes Cast 179,773 See Details »
1976 3 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to eliminate the authority of the governor to prorogue (that is, to extend) the recess of the legislature for up to ninety days?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 77,899 43.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		99,714 56.1%
Total Votes Cast 177,613 See Details »
1976 4 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that all legislators, for actual daily attendance on legislative days in regular or special session, shall be compensated at the computed daily rate of the salary established for the lowest grade classified state employee and that the presidin...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 78,511 44.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		97,941 55.5%
Total Votes Cast 176,452 See Details »
1976 5 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that when the office of governor is vacant, when the governor determines that he is unwilling or unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, or when the supreme court upon motion of a majority of the executive council and after he...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 92,373 52.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		84,401 47.7%
Total Votes Cast 176,774 See Details »
1976 6 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to allow district courts to try persons for crimes committed in a county other than the county where the court sits, with the result that the legislature could create district courts containing towns and cities located in more than one county?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 98,498 56.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		74,708 43.1%
Total Votes Cast 173,206 See Details »
1974 1 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to remove the restriction against the legislature granting pensions for more than one year at a time?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 127,244 64.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		70,951 35.7%
Total Votes Cast 198,195 See Details »
1974 2 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to prohibit denial or abridgment of equal rights by the state on account of race, creed, color, sex or national origin?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		135,989 67.5%
No
 65,421 32.5%
Total Votes Cast 201,410 See Details »
1974 3 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to allow an organizational meeting of the legislature m December rather than January biennially and to conform election reporting procedures to reflect that change; and to permit the legislature to finally dissolve on the first Wednesday of December rath...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		149,093 73.9%
No
 49,282 26.1%
Total Votes Cast 198,375 See Details »
1974 4 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to permit the legislature to provide alternate methods of taking the oath of office by senators and representatives when oaths cannot readily be taken before the governor and council?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 128,377 65.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		65,930 34.2%
Total Votes Cast 194,307 See Details »
1974 5 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to increase the size of the senate from twenty-four to thirty-six members and to make proportionate changes in the senate quorum and voting requirements and to permit division of a town, city ward or unincorporated place in forming senate districts when ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 91,372 46.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		105,942 54.0%
Total Votes Cast 197,314 See Details »
1974 6 Are you in favor of amending the New Hampshire Constitution to conform to the Federal requirements allowing eighteen year olds to vote?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		147,484 71.8%
No
 57,756 28.2%
Total Votes Cast 205,240 See Details »
1974 7 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to remove the restriction which provides that mileage may not be paid legislators for attendance at regular sessions after the first day of July following the convening of such session but retaining the restriction that they can not be paid mileage for m...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 112,638 57.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		82,706 42.5%
Total Votes Cast 195,344 See Details »
1974 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 44 32.4%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		92 67.6%
Total Votes Cast 136 See Details »
1974 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 28 38.4%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		45 61.6%
Total Votes Cast 73 See Details »
1974 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 53 38.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		84 61.3%
Total Votes Cast 137 See Details »
1974 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		46 54.1%
No
 39 45.9%
Total Votes Cast 85 See Details »
1972 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to provide that the legislature shall meet annually and that each member shall receive mileage payments for attendance at regular sessions for no more than ninety legislative days during the two years for which he is elected?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 173,281 61.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		110,377 38.9%
Total Votes Cast 283,658 See Details »
1972 Are you in favor of holding a convention to revise the Constitution?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		96,793 56.9%
No
 73,365 43.1%
Total Votes Cast 170,158 See Details »
1972 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		51 60.7%
No
 33 39.3%
Total Votes Cast 84 See Details »
1972 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 30 36.1%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		53 63.9%
Total Votes Cast 83 See Details »
1972 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		762 59.9%
No
 511 40.1%
Total Votes Cast 1,273 See Details »
1972 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		56 58.9%
No
 39 41.1%
Total Votes Cast 95 See Details »
1972 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 39 41.5%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		55 58.5%
Total Votes Cast 94 See Details »
1972 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		907 74.7%
No
 308 25.3%
Total Votes Cast 1,215 See Details »
1972 Are you in favor of amending the Constitution to allow eighteen year olds to vote and to provide that no person under twenty-one years of age may hold elective office?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 131,399 66.0%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		67,744 34.0%
Total Votes Cast 199,143 See Details »
1970 1 Are you in favor of amending the constitution by abolishing the current provisions for paying legislators two hundred dollars for a two-year term plus mileage and by establishing, instead, a legislative compensation commission, appointed by the governor and council and the supreme court, to biennial...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 93,463 52.3%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		91,190 47.7%
Total Votes Cast 184,653 See Details »
1970 2 Are you in favor of amending the constitution by requiring civil officers now named in the constitution to swear or affirm to bear faith and true allegiance to the United States of America as well as to the state of New Hampshire and to support the constitutions thereof?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		162,334 91.8%
No
 28,464 8.2%
Total Votes Cast 190,798 See Details »
1970 3 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide that the legislature shall meet annually and that each member shall receive mileage payments for attendance at regular sessions for no more than ninety legislative days during the two years for which he is elected?See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		122,768 66.7%
No
 61,221 33.3%
Total Votes Cast 183,989 See Details »
1970 4 Are you in favor of amending the constitution to provide for a four-year term for governor, the first of which terms shall commence in 1975, and provided that the governor shall be elected in November of the non-presidential election years, starting with the election in 1974. Further, provided that ...See Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 113,401 61.7%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		81,479 38.3%
Total Votes Cast 194,880 See Details »
1970 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 21 30.9%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		47 69.1%
Total Votes Cast 68 See Details »
1970 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		46 95.8%
No
 2 4.2%
Total Votes Cast 48 See Details »
1970 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		69 57.0%
No
 52 43.0%
Total Votes Cast 121 See Details »
1970 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		427 73.9%
No
 151 26.1%
Total Votes Cast 578 See Details »
1970 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		428 57.1%
No
 321 42.9%
Total Votes Cast 749 See Details »
1970 Shall state stores be operated by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,429 68.3%
No
 662 31.7%
Total Votes Cast 2,091 See Details »
1970 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
 31 40.8%
No
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		45 59.2%
Total Votes Cast 76 See Details »
1970 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		46 95.8%
No
 2 4.2%
Total Votes Cast 48 See Details »
1970 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		83 65.9%
No
 43 34.1%
Total Votes Cast 126 See Details »
1970 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		516 87.2%
No
 76 12.8%
Total Votes Cast 592 See Details »
1970 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		486 64.8%
No
 264 35.2%
Total Votes Cast 750 See Details »
1970 Shall malt beverages (beer) be sold by permission of the state liquor commission in this city or town?See Details » Local Question Various cities/towns
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		1,268 63.6%
No
 725 36.4%
Total Votes Cast 1,993 See Details »
1970 Statewide Question: Sweepstakes QuestionSee Details » Statewide Statewide
Response Vote Count %
Yes
Checkmark icon to designate the winner 		110,664 50.0%
No
 17,052 50.0%
Total Votes Cast 127,716 See Details »